Re: Transition Incubator dist area

2013-11-25 Thread David Crossley
On Nov 20, 2013 Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Nov 18, 2013 Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > > > If I've done everything right, it should be possible for Infra to flip the > > switch and use new-style dist.apache.org synchronization at the incubator/ > > level. > > Infra flipped the switch today. We now u

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Knox-0.3.1-incubating RC3

2013-11-25 Thread larry mccay
Hello All - Just to follow up on this thread, we will have these NOTICES file issues corrected in the next release and assume that this VOTE will continue in the absence of a -1 vote. Thank you again, for the insight here. --larry On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:40 AM, larry mccay wrote: > Hi Seb

Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating

2013-11-25 Thread David Crossley
David Nalley wrote: > > (and incidentally you don't seem to be moving older versions (0.6.0, > 0.6.1, etc) to the archive when promoting a new release. - see > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#when-to-archive for more) Anything that is in the "dist" area is automatically archived, as explai

[VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.2.0-incubating RC0

2013-11-25 Thread Hitesh Shah
Hello folks, I have created a tez-0.2.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the first release for Tez. Therefore, please do not be gentle. GIT source tag: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-0.2.0-rc0 Staging site: h

Re: [VOTE] Apache Helix as TLP Resolution

2013-11-25 Thread Suresh Marru
+ 1 (binding). Good to see Helix hatch out of incubation. Suresh On Nov 20, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > Here the vote for Apache Helix as TLP graduation. > > The vote result for dev@helix.i.a.o is available here: > http://markmail.org/message/22orwjy2v3d4af67 > > Vote open

Re: Release vote thresholds

2013-11-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > This would provide good oversight, while helping educate the PPMC > members and keep a good record of the release requirements that other > podlings can use as examples. And make sure people's +1s are based on > something tangible and

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire the Provisionr podling

2013-11-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Andrei Savu wrote: > I think we are done now. Thank you for cleaning up the camp site. Best wishes to Provisionr's contributors as you move on to other adventures. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscr

Re: [VOTE] Apache Helix as TLP Resolution

2013-11-25 Thread Olivier Lamy
ping. How many votes does it need? On 21 November 2013 12:07, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > Here the vote for Apache Helix as TLP graduation. > > The vote result for dev@helix.i.a.o is available here: > http://markmail.org/message/22orwjy2v3d4af67 > > Vote open for 72H > [+1] > [0] > [-1] > > > X.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire the Provisionr podling

2013-11-25 Thread Andrei Savu
I think we are done now. Thanks Tony! I will update the incubator report in a few days. -- Andrei Savu On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Andrei Savu wrote: > I've update the incubator project status page. > > All the remaining tasks are listed here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INF

Re: Majority vs Lazy Majority

2013-11-25 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, sebb wrote: > ...This is a bit of a mess Yeah - I wish projects would just refer to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html and http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html and avoid duplicating that information. -Bertrand

Re: Release vote thresholds

2013-11-25 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...Ant, you proposed a minimum of one IPMC vote for each release: ... > How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that they > don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it at least > three v