On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 14:41, ant elder wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the clarification, Ant. Is the documentation ignored?
> > Whenever I
> > > look through it, it seems like the problem is tha
On Apr 3, 2013, at 1:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> ...Chris proposes that this
>> committee recommend its own demise to the board, to be replaced, in
>> large part, by the board itself. Every board member who has been heard
>>
Hi, Matthieu,
It sounds like you folks are trying hard to get this right -- kudos!
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> 1/ about the content of LICENSE and NOTICE, is the following correct?
>
> - in the LICENSE file of the binary distribution, in addition to references
> to
On 3 April 2013 16:36, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> So how about having just historical info in the text file, and LDAP
>> for current info?
>>
>
> Isn't this the current rationale? I see the LDAP group answering the
> question "Does the person A belong to group B now?
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
Hey there, just back from vacation, hopefully Sebb can weigh in but
here's my thinking:
> We have 2 key questions, which I reproduce below:
>
> 1/ about the content of LICENSE and NOTICE, is the following correct?
>
> - in the LICENSE file o
Hello all,
after getting valuable comments about our release candidate 3 for S4 0.6.0,
we'd like to cut a new release candidate.
However, we are still not sure about how to address the comments we received,
and we cannot work on a new release candidate without understanding the proper
actions
Hello,
the kafka project needs to clean up.
Steps are described here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#project-first-steps
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Could you remove Kafka from the incubator report since it already graduated
> to a top l
Could you remove Kafka from the incubator report since it already graduated
to a top level project last Nov?
Thanks,
Jun
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I just realized I had replied in private and this is a comment for
> general@.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
So how about having just historical info in the text file, and LDAP
for current info?
Isn't this the current rationale? I see the LDAP group answering the
question "Does the person A belong to group B now?" and
committee-info.txt answering other questions, like how
On 3 April 2013 14:41, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the clarification, Ant. Is the documentation ignored?
> Whenever I
> > look through it, it seems like the problem is that it is incomplete and
> > confusing. It's hardly a wonder people
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification, Ant. Is the documentation ignored? Whenever I
> look through it, it seems like the problem is that it is incomplete and
> confusing. It's hardly a wonder people disagree. ;) (This is just a bit of
> rhetoric. I har
On Apr 1, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> As I see it, the primary attraction here is that we could end up with
> *one* coherent body of documentation on policies and procedures,
> available to project new and old.
For whatever it's worth, I'd like to participate in such an effort i
Thanks for the clarification, Ant. Is the documentation ignored? Whenever I
look through it, it seems like the problem is that it is incomplete and
confusing. It's hardly a wonder people disagree. ;) (This is just a bit of
rhetoric. I hardly mean to imply the documentation is responsible for the
wh
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> As far as I understand your comment, Ant, you mean to say that he problem
> is that there is too much variation in opinion and approach. (Primarily, I
> understand, in relation to releases.)
>
>
Hi Noah, i suggested that one of the problems was
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> ...Chris proposes that this
> committee recommend its own demise to the board, to be replaced, in
> large part, by the board itself. Every board member who has been heard
> from so far has been less than enthusiastic...
That's my case, an
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>... The real question might be why this needs to be duplicated (I assume)
>> between LDAP and a file - any advice from infra?
>
> It is not strictly duplicated. committee-info.txt contains historical
> informati
16 matches
Mail list logo
