On Mar 25, 2013, at 2:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>> ...Simple rule. If mentors don't sign two reports in a row,
>> shepherd checks they are subscribed to the dev list, and then contacts
>> them asking if they still want to be involved. I
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> So I am proposing now to reconsider Joes original proposal and change our
> community voting to a majority voting unless we restructure the IPMC.
+1 for majority voting on personnel issues for the IPMC.
I'm also fine with requiring a
On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept Apache Falcon into the Incubator because...
+1. Binding.
-- Leif
-
To unsubsc
On 25/03/13 08:41, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Now, you might argue that mentoring is a lot more than voting, but we
could create another bottleneck in getting release votes through,
requiring votes from incubator PMC members who are not particularly
foc
> +1 (non-binding) <
On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon
> (formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache
> Falcon into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till (Tue 3/
+ 1 non biding
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Idris Ali wrote:
> >+1 (non-binding) <
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon
> > (formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache
> > Falcon into the Incubator. I'll let t
>+1 (non-binding) <
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon
> (formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache
> Falcon into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till (Tue 3/26 6pm IST).
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Apache Falcon into the Inc
+1 (non-binding)
On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon
> (formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache
> Falcon into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run till (Tue 3/26 6pm IST).
>
> [
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> ...We also have 172 IPMC members to date (according committer index).
> Most of the people are not seen often; we have many awol mentors.
> Currently becoming an IPMC member is necessary to become a Mentor. It
> always felt wrong t
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> ...Simple rule. If mentors don't sign two reports in a row,
> shepherd checks they are subscribed to the dev list, and then contacts
> them asking if they still want to be involved. If they don't answer,
> then the shepherd goes to the podling pr
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> Now, you might argue that mentoring is a lot more than voting, but we
> could create another bottleneck in getting release votes through,
> requiring votes from incubator PMC members who are not particularly
> focused on the podling.
>
Thats
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013, at 07:52 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > following a thread on private@, I would like to bring the discussion
> > on how we vote on nominated IPMC members.
> >
> > We had the case were one person was nomin
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Matthias Friedrich wrote:
> On Monday, 2013-03-25, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
>> bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> [...]
>>> IMO it's the podlings who need to make sure they have enough mentor
>>> energy available
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> following a thread on private@, I would like to bring the discussion
> on how we vote on nominated IPMC members.
>
> We had the case were one person was nominated and received three +1.
> Another voter had concerns an voted -1.
Exactly. Simple rule. If mentors don't sign two reports in a row,
shepherd checks they are subscribed to the dev list, and then contacts
them asking if they still want to be involved. If they don't answer,
then the shepherd goes to the podling private list, and tells them that
mentor x is not respo
Yeah... the question of how much mentoring is kind of one of those things
that mentors should advise on.
Hmm... there's a problem.
This is one place that the shepherds really, really can come in handy for.
Likewise, simple hurdles like "all mentors have to sign off every report"
help highlight p
On Monday, 2013-03-25, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
[...]
>> IMO it's the podlings who need to make sure they have enough mentor
>> energy available - they are best placed to judge that, and delegating
>> that to th
17 matches
Mail list logo
