On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> At the bottom of the template for each podling's report, I'd like to have a
> space for each of the mentors, every month, to reaffirm his or her
> involvement in the podling. Thus, instead of (at most) one mentor signing
> off on the repo
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012, at 07:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Upayavira wrote on Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:48:28 +:
> > Having said that, I personally would like to see some kind of separation
> > between mentors and the incubator PMC. I think th PMC should be a
> > smaller, more active group who tak
Upayavira wrote on Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:48:28 +:
> Having said that, I personally would like to see some kind of separation
> between mentors and the incubator PMC. I think th PMC should be a
> smaller, more active group who take a more active interest in the
> incubator as it is, and perhap
The simple change that you seem to be suggesting is rather than having a
space where mentors can add their names, add their names to the report,
and expect them to sign +1 by it.
This seems quite reasonable, making it a little more obvious that
mentors at *supposed* to sign reports. It makes it ea
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I want to thank all of you for the vote(s) of confidence in recommending me
> as the IPMC chair. While it's always possible that the Board will decline
> the suggestion, it doesn't seem too terribly presumptuous to start looking
> ahead.
>
+1; this matches my understanding. -C
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> My understanding of mentor sign off is that all active mentors sign off,
> not just one. Lack of sign off means the mentor has been busy elsewhere for
> that quarter and feels unqualified to signoff.
>
> S
+1
I like the idea. We'll obviously need to update our docs.
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 4, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> acting as a mentor that was never my understanding. if the result of
> this thread is to clarify this point, fine.
>
> On Nov 4, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Ross Gardler wr
On Nov 4, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I want to thank all of you for the vote(s) of confidence in recommending me
> as the IPMC chair. While it's always possible that the Board will decline
> the suggestion, it doesn't seem too terribly presumptuous to start looking
> ahead.
>
>
acting as a mentor that was never my understanding. if the result of
this thread is to clarify this point, fine.
On Nov 4, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> My understanding of mentor sign off is that all active mentors sign off,
> not just one. Lack of sign off means the mentor has been b
My understanding of mentor sign off is that all active mentors sign off,
not just one. Lack of sign off means the mentor has been busy elsewhere for
that quarter and feels unqualified to signoff.
So,whilst looking for absent mentors is good I'd suggest we already have a
process in place and thus d
On Nov 4, 2012, at 23:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> At the bottom of the template for each podling's report, I'd like to have a
> space for each of the mentors, every month, to reaffirm his or her
> involvement in the podling. Thus, instead of (at most) one mentor signing
> off on the report,
I want to thank all of you for the vote(s) of confidence in recommending me
as the IPMC chair. While it's always possible that the Board will decline
the suggestion, it doesn't seem too terribly presumptuous to start looking
ahead.
My goal is to continue along the path blazed by Jukka, and then, l
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 2, 2012, at 2:00 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> Hi all,
> this is a call for vote to graduate the Syncope podling from Apache
> Incubator.
>
> Syncope entered the Incubator in Feb 2012. Since then it has added two
> new committers and PPMC members, picked up a coup
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
>> But hey what is most important build a community around cool
>> code/projects or being able to use the last "à la mode" scm tool ?
>
> as I wrote in a previous message, I personally just need a SCM that
> allows me continue developing soft
In light of all the issues uncovered, I am closing this vote thread. We
are working on fixing the issues and will be back with a new vote thread.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:55 AM, sebb wrote:
> > ...If I were the RM, I woul
Salut Olivier!
> AFAIK not possible (git is poor for supporting such sparse checkout mode).
> So we (infra folks) will have to maintain one git repo per component
> and create a new git repo for each new component (IMHO a pain ..).
> In some case git is probably nice but not here !
indeed, for wh
16 matches
Mail list logo
