+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
> potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
> incubation. They even went an extra mile and coll
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
> potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
> incubation. They even went an extra mile and col
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Since the official vote cut-off date has passed, I'd like to gently
>> remind that, with 6 "+1" votes from the community members we
>> would be very grateful if somebody from the IPMC
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Since the official vote cut-off date has passed, I'd like to gently
> remind that, with 6 "+1" votes from the community members we
> would be very grateful if somebody from the IPMC can take a look
> at the bits and give us the feedback.
H
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Leo Neumeyer wrote:
Perhaps there are concerns about relying on a third party but for an
organization powered by volunteers, using a free service like this could
be a great benefit. Perhaps there are good reasons why this cannot be
done but was wondering if it was discussed
I'm curious if you also discussed using a hosted service like GitHub for
the projects. Seems to me that it would save us so much in resources and
time to take advantage of their free accounts for open source projects and
they seem to be doing a pretty good job. Perhaps there are concerns about
rely
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Rave 0.5-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage OpenSocial,
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:01 PM, solomax wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >
> > Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The
> group
> > of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
> > potential obstacles to the Incubator acc
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> In addition you can ask on wave-dev. They have finally decided to
> loose history and do an initial checkin because it was not easily
> possible to convert.
>
Why are we doing this on any project when we potentially have a git
solution
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>>
>> In addition you can ask on wave-dev. They have finally decided to
>> loose history and do an initial checkin because it was not easily
>> possible to convert.
>
> Why are
Leo,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Leo Neumeyer wrote:
> cross-posting to incubator in case someone there also had to go through the
> git to svn migration and can share their experience.
I already mentioned you should take a look at this tool from Jukka Zitting;
https://github.com/jukka/git2s
cross-posting to incubator in case someone there also had to go through the
git to svn migration and can share their experience.
Is there a process we can follow to put s4 in the beta git program? I know
this can create additional work for the infra folks but seems we may
already have a beta syste
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
> potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
> incubation. They even went an extra mile and col
My vote is +1
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Jomar Silva wrote:
> +1
>
> Great software and very useful for me in Brazil.
>
> Best,
>
> Jomar
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrus Adamchik
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:53:41
> To:
> Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] A
+1
Great software and very useful for me in Brazil.
Best,
Jomar
-Original Message-
From: Andrus Adamchik
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:53:41
To:
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Openmeetings to Apache Incubator
Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few tim
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
> potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
> incubation. They even went an extra mile and coll
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley wrote:
>> Kalle Korhonen wrote:
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> I agree that using "kill search" is probably a bad idea.
>> "Suitable Names Search"
>
> Works for me (i
+1
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
> potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
> incubation. They even went an extra mile and coll
+1
2011/11/8 enterdv :
>
> +1
>
>
> Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
>> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all
>> potential obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the following
>> incubation. T
19 matches
Mail list logo
