Never mind, got my answer from
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the
- Henry
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to add incubator podling as a group target in the
> https://reviews.apache.org/dashboard/. Should I ju
+1 (binding)
Hi All,
I would like to add incubator podling as a group target in the
https://reviews.apache.org/dashboard/. Should I just open INFRA ticket
for this or is this something I could do myself?
I dont see the options to add new group with my account.
Thanks,
- Henry
--
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
> wrote:
>> +1 on the proposal
>>
>> But comment though on the mailing lists you asked for, I updated them,
>> so would you please take a look. In brief the changes are:
>>
>> 1- You missed ad
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> +1 on the proposal
>
> But comment though on the mailing lists you asked for, I updated them,
> so would you please take a look. In brief the changes are:
>
> 1- You missed adding odf-private@ which is for Podling Project
> Management
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
This proposal was sent to the Apache Incubator list a week ago. It
was suggested that the PDFBox and Tiki projects should be contacted as
well, to make members aware of this proposal.
If you have comments, please follow up to general@incubator.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
>>
>> Can we do this for now? If anyone is committed to the project and
>> able to contribute, please respond to this note with some indication
>> of your interest. The proposers can then review this information and
>> add names to the wiki ac
+1, please CC to Tika and PDFBox lists -- there will likely be interest...
Cheers,
Chris
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:27 AM, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
>>
>> Can we do this for now? If anyone is committed to the project and
>> able to contribute, please respond to this note with some indication
>> of your
+1 (binding)
Here is what I checked about:
1- RAT tool's report looked fine.
2- Signatures and hash values are OK.
3- Build and tests worked fine as explained on Hama web site.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> I believe Maven artifacts are only distributed for the
I believe Maven artifacts are only distributed for the ease of use as
another optional alternative for users to use, and once they are
distributed they need to satisfy certain criteria. But it is not a
MUST to have them.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:21 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 01:10, Edward
*And a special video channel where we can see the faces
of those that have to get up in the middle of the night to join the
meeting.* => :D Should be no problem if you run the restricted
roomtype. Or you record and replay it later on.
Sebastian
2011/7/25 Jeremias Maerki :
> On 21.07.2011 15:40:45
On 21.07.2011 15:40:45 seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> We would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator.
>
> Full Proposal:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
>
> Quick summary:
> OpenMeetings is Web Conferencing application that fits into
> educational or b
+1 for the proposal
I tried it out. It looks very promising :).
2011/7/25 seba.wag...@gmail.com :
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your feedback!
> @Scott: I think so too. Synchrious communication could become an
> standard feature of Social Networking Platforms. Lets see if there is
> an API in Rave for int
+1 on the proposal
But comment though on the mailing lists you asked for, I updated them,
so would you please take a look. In brief the changes are:
1- You missed adding odf-private@ which is for Podling Project
Management Committee specific discussion which MUST be private.
2- For issues and CI
+1
On Jul 24, 2011, at 10:38 PM, Bill Graham wrote:
+1
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <
nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1 (Binding)
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Ashish
wrote:
+1
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Avery Ching
wrote:
Hi and good friday to
>
> Can we do this for now? If anyone is committed to the project and
> able to contribute, please respond to this note with some indication
> of your interest. The proposers can then review this information and
> add names to the wiki accordingly. There is a "checks and balances"
> aspect to t
Hi,
thanks for your feedback!
@Scott: I think so too. Synchrious communication could become an
standard feature of Social Networking Platforms. Lets see if there is
an API in Rave for integration.
Sebastian
2011/7/23 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> Good idea!!! I had the opportunity to try OM, nice tool!
17 matches
Mail list logo