+1
...ant
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good
> shape so I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the
> Incubator.
>
> The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal and al
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good shape
> so I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator.
>
> The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal and al
+1
Ralph
On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:08 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good shape
> so I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator.
>
> The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal and also
> cop
+1
D.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good
> shape so I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the
> Incubator.
>
> The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal and also
> cop
Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good shape so
I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal and also
copied as text below.
Please vote.
[ ] +1 Accept Rave into the incu
I think the 'Known Risks' section in the proposal enumerates that
pretty clearly, so I won't repeat it.
I don't know why anyone would take exception to it be included in the
Incubator. It seems like a good fit, as long as the stated known risks
are addressed during incubation. My statements were m
On 24/02/2011 23:11, Troy Howard wrote:
In my opinion, a reasonable compromise would be to set it as a project
goal to reduce corporate dependency on the committers list.
I'm really confused where this is coming from. The goal of incubation is
to generate sufficient diversity in contributions
In my opinion, a reasonable compromise would be to set it as a project
goal to reduce corporate dependency on the committers list.
I would take that so far as to treat it as a bug, place an issue in
JIRA to that effect, and schedule a date/version for the issue to be
resolved. This will remind eve
The naming conflict was brought up but as far as I'm concerned it has
not been resolved.
+1 for incubating.
Change the name, before or after starting incubation. I can suggest to
you it's easier to change the name before starting.
Craig
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:53 AM, ant elder wrote:
The
I'm looking forward to a vote on this proposal.
I've read the thread and I think it's good to know **up front** that
there are going to be corporate contributions, not just from one
corporation.
Craig
On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
I would like to propose the Apache Rave p
Hi Thorsten,
When we prepared the Chemistry OpenCMIS release process, we referred to the
Maven specific Apache release guide [1].
As an example, OpenCMIS specific release info can be found at [2] (though we
still need to update it after the recent TLP graduation).
HTH,
Gab
[1] http://www.apache
+1
Ralph
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an Incubator project. The
> proposal is available at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HowlProposal. You
> can see the discussion from the proposal thread at http://tinyurl.com/5w7y9p9.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 24/02/11 09:49, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
On 24/02/11 09:49, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
Corporation, the
Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the S
Hi Torsten,
> Droids is planing to do its first release and we are looking into using
> the maven-release-plugin. Now the question is at what point in time we
> actually use it. I mean we need to create first the release candidates
> which should be tested, right?
>
> How other projects do this?
Hi Thorsten,
This wiki page explains how we take care of this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process
Also see this guide for setting up your pom's:
http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#inherit-parent
On the release process you might want to rea
Hi all,
Droids is planing to do its first release and we are looking into using
the maven-release-plugin. Now the question is at what point in time we
actually use it. I mean we need to create first the release candidates
which should be tested, right?
How other projects do this?
TIA for any inp
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>
>> The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
>> Corporation, the
>> Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the SURFnet SURFConext
>> Portal project,
Whilst I agree it has been discussed and understood I'm still trying to
understand what the issue being raised is. A bunch of the initial committees
are already ASF Members, the proposal does not talk of the initial backers
other than in tue ways required by the proposal process and we make it c
19 matches
Mail list logo
