On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the
> IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the
> objections. That being said, I'm not all that clever at naming, so...
You rather like which name??
My take
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the IPMC? I
rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the objections. That being
said, I'm not all that clever at naming, so...
On Aug 25, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 06:49 -0400, Grant Inger
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 06:49 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Sure would have been nice if these objections (other than David's) would have
> been brought up last week before we went and changed everything (after
> waiting several days for feedback) b/c we were working under the assumption
> that
Sure would have been nice if these objections (other than David's) would have
been brought up last week before we went and changed everything (after waiting
several days for feedback) b/c we were working under the assumption that no one
thought it was a problem.
At any rate, we'll go discuss.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote:
>
>> But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making
>> assumptions about a name.
>>
>> Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors
>> Framework tells me it is eit
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
wrote:
> ...It is of course fine to trim the list at the point of
> graduation by looking at those who actually contributed during the
> incubation phase vs. just adding their name as "oh yes I'll contribute"
I agree that that's important,
+1 (Not binding)
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache Isis.
> If accepted, Isis will combine the existing open source Naked Objects
> framework with a collection of sister projects, providing an extensible
> Ja
On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote:
> But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making
> assumptions about a name.
>
> Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors
> Framework tells me it is either a generic connectors framework for
> connecting a
