Sure would have been nice if these objections (other than David's) would have been brought up last week before we went and changed everything (after waiting several days for feedback) b/c we were working under the assumption that no one thought it was a problem.
At any rate, we'll go discuss. On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:32 AM, Pid wrote: > On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote: > >> But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making >> assumptions about a name. >> >> Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors >> Framework tells me it is either a generic connectors framework for >> connecting anything to anything, or it is for connecting httpd to >> something else, neither of which I suspect are what it is all about. > > Exactly. > >> If the name is going to change (which sounds like a good idea) I'd >> suggest going for something more abstract, to which you can give >> meaning: Apache Connecto, or some such. > > +1 from me too. > > > p > >> Upayavira >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > <0x62590808.asc> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
