Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

2009-12-03 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: >> Paul Querna wrote: >>> >>> httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically, >>> they aren't based on any release. >> >> Were these published these on the official public we

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

2009-12-03 Thread Paul Querna
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: >> >> httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically, >> they aren't based on any release. > > Were these published these on the official public website or in the dev/ > section? > > I was under the impress

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The following votes were given: +1 Alan Cabrera (transferred from vote on vcl-...@i.a.o list) +1 Kevan Miller (transferred from vote on vcl-...@i.a.o list) +1 Niall Pemberton +1 Ant Elder Leo Simons made some notable comments: > 3) There is no websi

Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion

2009-12-03 Thread Doug Cutting
Paul Querna wrote: httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically, they aren't based on any release. Were these published these on the official public website or in the dev/ section? I was under the impression that released documentation should be treated similarly to rel