On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere
>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
> > wrote:
> > [X] -1
>
> Distribution archives are broken.
> >>>
> >>> Maven artifacts don't have
On 11/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about
> your verdict.
>
> However I have problems to reproduce your findings.
> I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from
> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-
On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> >> Distribution files are located here
> >> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
> >
> > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents.
>
>
> I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal.
>
>
> >
> > The
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> > The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains
> 5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and
> content of the files do match.
>
> c
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
> wrote:
> [X] -1
Distribution archives are broken.
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
>>
>> That war contains jar's that each contain their
Hi Rainer,
> The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains 5
> empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and content
> of the files do match.
could you tell me which ones those are?
>
> Also I could not find any raw class files or eclipse proj
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
>>> > [X] -1
>>>
>>> Distribution archives are broken.
>>
>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
>
> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice
> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L?
>> > [X] -1
>>
>> Distribution archives are broken.
>
> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice
files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us
to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the fu
Hi Sebb,
thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about your
verdict.
However I have problems to reproduce your findings.
I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from
http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
The only difference I could find, was that the zi
>> Distribution files are located here
>> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
>
> The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents.
I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal.
>
> They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files
>
Peter Peshev wrote:
Anyway - after reading the proposal , my mental model for Aries is the
following - a group of bundles or web archives (here comes RFC 66 )
are grouped via a new extended SCA component type (
implementation.osgi_application) or perhaps inherit from the
implementation.jee tha
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-rc2. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
structured key-value store.
Podling vote thread:
http:/
On 11/09/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
> > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our
> > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a f
On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
> now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our
> previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release
> candidate.
>
> These are the
This vote is being cancelled because it was lapped by the next proposed
release candidate, (and because no one would vote for it).
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 10:40 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
> Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like t
I'm also interested in the Aries project and would like to sign up as an
initial committer, especially in the area of distributed OSGi. I have been
the key contributor in Apache Tuscany project to enable the runtime with
OSGi and implement the OSGi remote services (originally RFC 119) using SCA
Hi Jeremy,
Yes, I would try to do that on Monday morning
Best Regards
Peter
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> As discussion is settling down, I'd like to aim for Tuesday next week
> (15 Sept) to call a vote.
>
> Peter, does that give you time to supply your initial set of
Hi Jeremy,
No I don't feel strongly for this, I am not suggesting a change of the
proposal, I am just trying to build a detailed picture for myself
(and perhaps for the community) what exactly some parts of Aries
project would look like. I am not Apache experienced, so I am not
sure whether I sh
As discussion is settling down, I'd like to aim for Tuesday next week
(15 Sept) to call a vote.
Peter, does that give you time to supply your initial set of committers?
Thanks,
Jeremy
2009/9/10 Jeremy Hughes :
> 2009/9/10 Peter Peshev :
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> Thanks , we would need a few more days
I've added both Jean-Sebastien and you to the proposal.
2009/9/11 Carsten Ziegeler :
> Hi,
>
> sounds like interesting stuff. I would like to be added to the initial
> committer list as well :)
>
> Thanks
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziege...@apache.org
>
>
Hi,
sounds like interesting stuff. I would like to be added to the initial
committer list as well :)
Thanks
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
21 matches
Mail list logo
