On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:01 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> There seem to be several copies of some files, e.g.
> >
> > dojo.js.uncompressed.js
> > custom_rhino.jar
> > flash6_gateway.fla
> >
>
>
> Hmm, cust
That particular Rhino jar is the same one we've been using since the
start, so I assume it is the old MPL one.
James Margaris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Martin Cooper
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:58 PM
To: general@incubator.apach
On 13/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:01 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
>
> On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EM
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:01 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There seem to be several copies of some files, e.g.
>
> dojo.js.uncompressed.js
> custom_rhino.jar
> flash6_gateway.fla
>
Hmm, custom_rhino.jar is an interesting one. Prior to version 1.6R5, I
believe Rhino was MPL licensed, and
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:01 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mai
On 11/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:23 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve Apache XAP 0.5.0 Release
>
> On 10/03/2008, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 06 March 2008, Martin Ritchie wrote:
>
> > We are
> > again working as a community to provide a M2.1 release that will inter
> > operate at AMQP 0-9 with other AMQP products outside the Apache world.
> > I for
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008 03:04, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > That all said, I'm NOT on the IPMC. Thus, my thoughts don't really
> > count other than to provide insight based on MY experiences. I don't
> > have a binding vote.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Trenaman, Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Agreed! SOA and REST can complement each other very nicely thank you
> very much. However, I think that it's important to bring the REST stuff
> out; let's not restrict CXF to be just about SOA.
IMHO ROA is the approp
Agreed! SOA and REST can complement each other very nicely thank you
very much. However, I think that it's important to bring the REST stuff
out; let's not restrict CXF to be just about SOA.
/Ade
-Original Message-
From: Frank Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 March 2008 15:30
To
*tip-toeing around potential flames* ... I wouldn't specifically call
out SOA & REST design principals.
Personally, I consider REST to be a perfectly acceptable (desirable,
perhaps even ideal) design principal that one should use within an SOA.
Therefore, I don't really see the need to explicitly
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Seems to capture the spirit of the project.
+1
I'd insert "and " just before "consuming".
>
+1
- robert
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Bob Buffone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incubator PM,
>
> The XAP team has put together a new release of the project (0.5.0) and
> it has been approved by the xap-dev list with 8 (+1s) and 0 (others). We
> are now asking the Incubator PM to approve this release s
i'm trying to pull together some best practice documentation for the initial
code import. i'm going to throw some (quite possibly incoherent) opinions
out there to start discussion but if anyone has opinions feel free to ignore
the strawman...
IMO the original sources covered by the appropriate ag
... but REST *is* SOA, isn't it? SOA doesn't complement REST-- it
*encompasses* REST. My (non-binding) vote is to include the "SOA" but
not call out "REST".
-Original Message-
From: Trenaman, Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 11:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:03 -0400, Christopher Moesel wrote:
>
>
> ... but REST *is* SOA, isn't it? SOA doesn't complement REST-- it
> *encompasses* REST. My (non-binding) vote is to include the "SOA" but
> not call out "REST".
>
>
+1 that was my point, thank you for clarifying :-)
Its u
Thanks for taking the time to look at this release and for these points. I
won't have time to address them immediately. A couple of them I think I may
not be issues, but I'm going to need to do a respin when I can get to it.
Kelvin.
On 10/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/03/
Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 06/03/2008, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Daniel Kulp write:
> a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1 [suggests
that]
all but 4 commits since Jan 1 can easily be contributed to RedHat
employees.
I think the
Would you also add REST to that description, given our support for
JAX-RS?
"framework for creating, deploying, and consuming services based on SOA
and REST design principles"
Ade.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 March 2008 02:50
To: general
19 matches
Mail list logo
