On 6/20/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
Wicket as a project.
I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
supported Wicket during the incubation for their guidance, effort and
time.
THANK
On 6/18/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so please review and either post comments or just dive in and patch
I will have a hands on review coming up, so I'll keep making those notes!
Martijn
--
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a
We just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
Wicket as a project.
I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
supported Wicket during the incubation for their guidance, effort and
time.
THANK YOU!
Martijn Dashorst
At present all private list archives are available only to ASF Members. This
is not policy so much as a pragmatic limitation of available ACLs. apmail is
the owner and apmember is the group. We have talked about having a protected
web interface to private lists, but thus no one has stepped
Hi Upayavira,
On Jun 20, 2007, at 12:04 PM, Upayavira wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Getting back to my original comment, I don't see how the IPMC can
meaningfully participate in a discussion or vote held on the PPMC
private mailing list. I don't think it's reasonable for an IPMC
member wh
My proposition might be stupid, but what if the IPMC had two private
lists. One purely IPMC (to discuss things like accepting a new IPMC
member) and an other used by IPMC and all PPMC?
It solve your problem of IPMC not being able to participate/follow
PPMC private discusion An other benefits is
Craig L Russell wrote:
Getting back to my original comment, I don't see how the IPMC can
meaningfully participate in a discussion or vote held on the PPMC
private mailing list. I don't think it's reasonable for an IPMC member
who is exercising oversight in the specific case of a new committer t
I notice that we already have a place where we can put structured
information. Each project has a .xml file where the status
is recorded. This file gets transformed into the .html file
for the site.
"All we need to do" is to decide on an xml tag that identifies the
reporting schedule and
On 6/19/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/07, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/19/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
wrote:
> > 1. should the information be public?
Yes.
> > 2. should the information be machine readable?
> Not at the expens
Getting back to my original comment, I don't see how the IPMC can
meaningfully participate in a discussion or vote held on the PPMC
private mailing list. I don't think it's reasonable for an IPMC
member who is exercising oversight in the specific case of a new
committer to be required to su
Upayavira wrote:
> The implication here is that, if we consider the IPMC to have the role
> of overseeing podlings
Is there an "if" there? ;-) That *is* the job of the Incubator PMC, and it is
the sole holder of that role.
> IPMC members must have the necessary rights to do so.
The Incubato
Hi,
I've asked to a friend of mine who is a graphic designer (the guy who
designed the Ivy logo, as well as others logo we used at jayasoft) to give
this logo design a try. He should send me something in the coming days, I'll
keep you informed.
Xavier
On 6/17/07, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:37 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 6/7/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All very good suggestions.
ant elder wrote:
>
> How about changing it so;
>
> (1) incubator-private is notified that discussion of a new
committer is
I like the "Graduated^X^X^X^X^X^X survived the Incubator and all I got
was this lousy t shirt" best.
Paul
On 6/18/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
there was quite a bit of discussion about suitable wording. i'm not sure
that a consensus was reached. there isn't any reason w
On Jun 18, 2007, at 6:37 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
opinions?
improvements?
alternatives?
Somehow I missed this t-shirt/apparel effort so far. I think all of
them are acceptable, I liked both of the logos I saw, and its just in
general really really really cool we're doing this! Go go
On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Trustin Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/06/2007 09:32:44:
> > > Our primary goal is not about forking dnsjava. I think it's our
last
> > > resort. Especially, I appreciate your effort to maintain dnsjava
> > > project as a previous
"Trustin Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/06/2007 09:32:44:
> > > Our primary goal is not about forking dnsjava. I think it's our
last
> > > resort. Especially, I appreciate your effort to maintain dnsjava
> > > project as a previous user and a fan. With a bigger community, we
> > > could
On 6/20/07, Brian Wellington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The intent here is about build a community around DNS protocol
> implementation. I agree with you that dnsjava is a very mature and
> stable product. But there are also demand for asynchronous DNS
> implementation. dnsjnio is a good ex
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Trustin Lee wrote:
On 6/19/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What if there were a "frequently updated" dnsjava, containing all of the
>> useful community-contributed patches (including dnsjnio), released
>> under a
>> BSD license - would that be a good solut
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Trustin Lee wrote:
Hi Brian,
On 6/20/07, Brian Wellington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Trustin Lee wrote:
> On 6/19/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> What if there were a "frequently updated" dnsjava, containing all of
the
>> >> use
20 matches
Mail list logo
