Hi Martin,
On May 21, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Out of curiosity, what form does the reporting to the Sponsor
and Incubator PMC take? If it's in writing and public, where
can the rest of the podling community see it?
That detail is not documented anywhere.
Craig
Martin
Craig
Out of curiosity, what form does the reporting to the Sponsor
and Incubator PMC take? If it's in writing and public, where
can the rest of the podling community see it?
Martin
Craig L Russell wrote:
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling, gu
Would this be ok?
Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling,
guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the
Sponsor and the Incubator PMC. All Mentors must be members of the
Incubator PMC. A Mentor has responsibilities toward the Incubator
On 5/21/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is, afaik, still some people who think that having
more than one Mentor is unwise (the old saw is more than
one mentor means no mentors)... If a podling wishes
to have just 1, we should honor that, I think.
Therefore I would think some s
Hi Bill,
On May 20, 2007, at 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Please review the changes in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept
Just an FYI - I haven't followed the jira flow terribly well,
mostly because
it takes an order of mag
All the listed issues have been solved for a few days now. Robert mentioned
being offline this week so could somebody else pick this up? We still need 2
IPMC votes for this release.
Thanks!
Matthieu
On 5/17/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've posted a new RC addressing all the is
On May 20, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Please review the changes in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
INCUBATOR-60 and vote to accept them. Since this is Incubator
Policy, an affirmative vote is needed before changing. The JIRA
issue has .html files to review in addition t
On May 21, 2007, at 8:26 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Just an FYI - I haven't followed the jira flow terribly well,
mostly because
it takes an order of magnitude longer in time to parse a Jira
incident rather
than approve a patch posted to the list. If you could at least
attach the
patch
On May 21, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 20, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
In more general terms: is it considered good practise to CC both
parties with 'official' communication between the private@ and the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generally, I'd say that it might be con
