Please let us know. I'll keep a watch out for speeding up the review and voting.
thanks,
dims
On 3/29/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ken,
> The UIMA podling has a fairly serious problem that was inadvertently
> introduced as part of the move to Apache, and was discovered by
> t
On Thursday 29 March 2007 21:02, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> 1. The new JAR is put in the same download area as the UIMA release,
> appropriately named.
> 2. A notice and instructions are posted to the Web and the mailing
> lists.
>
> Since this is not a full release issue, I'd like to as
On 3/29/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 28, 2007, at 2:22 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. To
>> answer your
>> questions:
>>
>> The files *
Ken,
> The UIMA podling has a fairly serious problem that was inadvertently
> introduced as part of the move to Apache, and was discovered by
> the users after the recent release. The fix is to update a few
> files in a JAR; i.e., provide a replacement JAR.
Sounds fine, but ...
> I don't recall
I've waited out on the vote intentionally to see what others hand.
The licensing issues that RAT turned up seem minor to me, especially
being in project files that are not part of a binary distribution and
probably not even needed for compilation of the codebase in general.
So...
+1 on
On 3/29/07, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The UIMA podling has a fairly serious problem that was inadvertently
introduced as part of the move to Apache, and was discovered by
the users after the recent release. The fix is to update a few
files in a JAR; i.e., provide a replac
On 3/29/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
From my reading of the incubator PPMC guide, the guide only talks
about the process up to the point where the PPMC votes to offer
commit privileges to a new member. It then links to the PMC document
that Martin refers to.
now i
The UIMA podling has a fairly serious problem that was inadvertently
introduced as part of the move to Apache, and was discovered by
the users after the recent release. The fix is to update a few
files in a JAR; i.e., provide a replacement JAR.
I don't recall seeing this sort of thing coming up b
