APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
Thanks Robert! No, you don't have to feel bad about your +0 vote, you did
your part.
All: Please review this release and give me your vote so I can move this
release on. At least, let me know if what Robert found is (the one file
that has old license header) is a release stopper so I can go back
On Mar 28, 2007, at 2:22 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. To
answer your
questions:
The files *.csproj, and *.sln are the Visual Studio.NET project
files --
those ar
I'd have to say that it's the mentors who need to ask for accounts and
grant karma (or get someone else to grant karma).
thanks,
dims
On 3/28/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
From my reading of the incubator PPMC guide, the guide only talks
about the process up to the
Hi Robert,
From my reading of the incubator PPMC guide, the guide only talks
about the process up to the point where the PPMC votes to offer
commit privileges to a new member. It then links to the PMC document
that Martin refers to.
It's not documented in the PMC document how to apply the
On 3/28/07, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The qpid project voted three new members to their project. I was just
following the New Committer info on :
http://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
and noticed:
If you are acting on behalf of a project which was accepted for
incubation,
On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking your time and looking at this release. To answer your
questions:
The files *.csproj, and *.sln are the Visual Studio.NET project files --
those are auto generated and thus I can't edit them outside the IDE -- the
On 3/28/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See this document:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/public-archives.html..
Also, our lists, like many others, are archived elsewhere as well, see
for example:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.net.user/369/focus=379
So
See this document:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/public-archives.html
On 3/28/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
How do I delete / remove an email from the Lucene.Net mailing list archive?
Someone post on the mailing list where their business info. was included but
don
Hi folks,
How do I delete / remove an email from the Lucene.Net mailing list archive?
Someone post on the mailing list where their business info. was included but
don't want it to show (see email below.) He asked me if I can remove the
posting. Is it possible? Here are the two postings:
http:/
On 3/28/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not making it a *rule* to change the subject of podling release
votes, where things come up, that needs to be fixed.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-revote
-T.
--
for the first release, perhaps we could arrange an audit rather than a
conventional release vote
sounds good !
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ma
Ted Leung wrote:
>
> In order for Heraldry to continue
> there needs to be enough of the code committers who want to continue,
+1
> and 3 or 4 is a little small in my eyes. I really do not want to be
> back in this situation again in a few months.
3 actual committers is *fine*. (3 proposed co
On 3/28/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 3/28/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really appreciate Robert's comments, but I also see your point.
> Why not making it a *rule* to change the subject of podling release
> votes, where things come up, that needs
This was my bad. I wrote the subject line first and then the content
ended up not matching.
Ted
On Mar 28, 2007, at 3:29 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Oi!
On Mar 21, 2007, at 6:19 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
So I'm bringing this back to the Incubator PMC for discussion and
ultimately, a vote.
I would
On Mar 28, 2007, at 8:06 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Gav wrote:
Would you add those four, pending CLAs as necessary? So a starting
Community of 7, again pending CLAs.
More like a community of 4.
A 'community' includes those on the dev list, not just committers/
pmc.
True enough. :-)
Gav wrote:
> > > Would you add those four, pending CLAs as necessary? So a starting
> > > Community of 7, again pending CLAs.
> > More like a community of 4.
> A 'community' includes those on the dev list, not just committers/pmc.
True enough. :-)
> I have offered several times to help where
The qpid project voted three new members to their project. I was just
following the New Committer info on :
http://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
and noticed:
If you are acting on behalf of a project which was accepted for
incubation, please get in touch with the sponsoring PMC and let the
Hi,
On 3/28/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 21, 2007, at 6:19 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
> So I'm bringing this back to the Incubator PMC for discussion and
> ultimately, a vote.
I would really appreciate it if we could all try to keep [VOTE] tags
in subject lines restricted to thing
Hi,
On 3/28/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really appreciate Robert's comments, but I also see your point.
Why not making it a *rule* to change the subject of podling release
votes, where things come up, that needs to be fixed.
Isn't that the perfect cause for a -1 vote w
Hey Leo,
I agree.
PPS: I have a similar problem with all the podling release [VOTE]s.
Often there's something to fix, and that has already been flagged
(more often than not by Robert) by the time I have the time to
investigate.
I really appreciate Robert's comments, but I also see your point.
Oi!
On Mar 21, 2007, at 6:19 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
So I'm bringing this back to the Incubator PMC for discussion and
ultimately, a vote.
I would really appreciate it if we could all try to keep [VOTE] tags
in subject lines restricted to things that actually need a vote (e.g.
yes/no/+1/-1)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 March 2007 1:22 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Revised Heraldry commit ACL
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 7:42 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > Ted,
> >
> > The list of
> >
> >
23 matches
Mail list logo
