Hi, On 3/28/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really appreciate Robert's comments, but I also see your point. Why not making it a *rule* to change the subject of podling release votes, where things come up, that needs to be fixed.
Isn't that the perfect cause for a -1 vote with an explanation? I don't see why that should be taken to a separate thread. If there are issues that need to be solved, then the original vote needs to be withdrawn and a new one started. A better solution would to encourage the podlings to do better quality control already before the IPMC is called to vote on the release. Project mentors should IMHO be more active in this, both by educating the projects on the release requirements and by reviewing the release candidates already before the the IPMC vote is started. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
