On 3/18/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So the problem is
when a single company provides resources for a given
project. In such a case, other committers usually come from
the user community and this takes time. I think that
one of the goal of the podling should be to build a user
On 3/16/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Trinidad community voted to release its "core" (the JSF component set)
as a 1.0.0-incubating release. To fulfill the incubator guides, we
like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission to release
those jsf components.
maj
Hi,
On 3/19/07, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although I am not part of the jakarta organisation (so I have no right to
vote)
Only the votes from Incubator PMC members are binding, but this
certainly doesn't mean that others aren't allowed to participate in
the vote. In fact it's e
Hi,
On 3/18/07, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to make the Tika people aware that we've recently started a
little XMP framework as part of the XML Graphics Project. XMP is used
with a number of document formats, with PDF its most prominent format.
It could be interesting
On 3/19/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Please vote on the proposal that follows. The vote is open for the
> next 72 hours and only votes from the Incubator PMC are binding.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Tika as a new podling
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Please vote on the proposal that follows. The vote is open for the
next 72 hours and only votes from the Incubator PMC are binding.
[ ] +1 Accept Tika as a new podling
[ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please)
The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apa
Jukka Zitting wrote:
This is a proposal to start a content analysis toolkit project in the
Apache Incubator. The live version of the proposal is available at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TikaProposal.
+1
Doug
-
To unsubsc
This may have been lost in the flood of other release mails - so far
was have +1's from Robert and Dims but still need a third.
Thanks
Jeremy
On Mar 18, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1
On 3/18/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 3/16/07, Jeremy Boynes <[
Another vote that may have been lost in the flood. So far a +1 from
robert.
Thanks
--
Jeremy
On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:33 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/14/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:46 PM, rober
On 3/15/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Two parts to the vote:
ONE: Should Incubator tarballs go in the normal place (and thus mirrors).
[x] +1
[ ] -1
TWO: Should there be an Incubator maven repository.
[ ] +1
[x] -1
So long as Incubator releases are distributed as artifacts of
On 3/15/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If these are indeed going to be official releases, we should totally
dispense with the requirements for "-incubating" in artifact filenames
and version numbers, let them announce the releases on announcements@
mailing lists, and all the othe
Hi,
On 3/18/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> I live in the Boston area
FWIW, I am here (downtown) until Thursday.
How about pizza and beer or a similar dinner this Wednesday, 3/21?
Noel, George, and anyone else in the Boston area, you're welcome.
Yoav
--
On 3/18/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the
proposed Tika project. I posted the proposal draft for review a while
ago, and the final proposal text is included below. The only changes
in the proposal text are the addition
On Monday 19 March 2007 15:52, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> So, my advice for new such projects would be to go to the Labs if your
> primary interest is in peer review and cooperation on technical
> issues, and to the Incubator if the main focus is in community growth.
> Of course these things overlap a
14 matches
Mail list logo
