APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
On Mar 14, 2007, at 3:33 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 3/14/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:46 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> the source and binary kernel releases look identical
>>
>> zip errors
On 3/14/07, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/14/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Not mirroring tar.gz releases is dumb. Infra aren't worried about
> the bandwidth and it's pointless to not put things on mirrors.
+++1.
> * Pulling releases because something didn'
On 3/14/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:53 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 3:46 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> the source and binary kernel releases look identical
>>
>> zip errors in jars unpackaged from kernel-2.0-alpha-incubating.zip:
>>
On 3/14/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Not mirroring tar.gz releases is dumb. Infra aren't worried about
the bandwidth and it's pointless to not put things on mirrors.
+++1.
* Pulling releases because something didn't graduate is bad.
+1. Once we release it in any form, to
Let's then at least *mirror* the thing to other (maven) repo's..
Mvgr,
Martin
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> We've discussed this many times before, and so far the consensus has been to
> not conflate the Incubator artifacts with regular ASF artifacts. I am
> still -1 to conflating ASF artifacts with
We've discussed this many times before, and so far the consensus has been to
not conflate the Incubator artifacts with regular ASF artifacts. I am
still -1 to conflating ASF artifacts with incubator artifacts, but that's
just my view.
--- Noel
--
On 3/14/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 from me too. my 2 cents.
-- dims
On 3/14/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed this many times before, and so far the consensus has been to
> not conflate the Incubator artifacts with regular ASF artifacts. I
-1 from me too. my 2 cents.
-- dims
On 3/14/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've discussed this many times before, and so far the consensus has been to
not conflate the Incubator artifacts with regular ASF artifacts. I am
still -1 to conflating ASF artifacts with incubator arti
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Interested in what other views are there.
My view:
* Not mirroring tar.gz releases is dumb. Infra aren't worried about
the bandwidth and it's pointless to not put things on mirrors.
I'll concur.
* Pulling releases because something didn't gr
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Interested in what other views are there.
>
> My view:
>
> * Not mirroring tar.gz releases is dumb. Infra aren't worried about
> the bandwidth and it's pointless to not put things on mirrors.
I'll concur.
> * Pulling releases because something didn't graduate is bad.
I l
Besides that : incubator releases are just as official as non incubator
releases (at least legally).
They are just not yet Apache projects..
Mvgr,
Martin
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Interested in what other views are there.
>
> My view:
>
> * Not mirroring tar.gz releases is dumb. Infra aren't worr
On 3/14/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes I do.
This discussion has been ongoing in the past.
My personal opinion is that an "incubator" in the groupId or
artifactId would be more than sufficient to mark the Incubator status,
but that won't help.
Jochen
--
Emacs 22 will suppo
On 3/14/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Having a separate maven repository so that things don't go to maven
central is just a hamstring on the products and yet another repository
to be concerned with.
I agree - there's no point in placing further hurdles in front of
Incubating p
Interested in what other views are there.
My view:
* Not mirroring tar.gz releases is dumb. Infra aren't worried about
the bandwidth and it's pointless to not put things on mirrors.
* Pulling releases because something didn't graduate is bad.
* Having a separate maven repository so that things d
Thanks - it does.
FWIW my mailer sends .diff as application/octet-stream and .txt as
text/plain
On Mar 14, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 3/14/07, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks! There is also the less severe problem with ezmlm stripping
attachments from some
On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:57 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Thanks! There is also the less severe problem with ezmlm stripping
attachments from some posts (see INFRA-1194). So far I haven't been
able to identify what causes them to be removed. Does anyone have
any ideas?
Just from observation e.g. subm
On 3/14/07, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks! There is also the less severe problem with ezmlm stripping
attachments from some posts (see INFRA-1194). So far I haven't been
able to identify what causes them to be removed. Does anyone have
any ideas?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Hen,
Am sure we agree to disagree :) So if you wish, please start a vote to
change status quo.
thanks,
dims
On 3/14/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes I do.
If we are releasing them publicly, then they are public. Doesn't
matter whether they go to the central repository or not.
Yes I do.
If we are releasing them publicly, then they are public. Doesn't
matter whether they go to the central repository or not. Trying to
have a half measure of "let's release something, but then hamstring
it" is pointless.
Same thing holds for suggestions that incubator dist/ releases shoul
The Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating release vote is now closed. Here is
the summary:
+1 Votes
-
Jean Anderson (binding)
Ken Coar (binding)
Sam Ruby (binding)
Thilo Goetz
0 Votes: None
-1 Votes: None
My understanding is that this vote has passed and we can proceed with
announcing our
Me :) Do you really want releases for projects under incubation to get
to ibiblio public repo? We can't pull those artifacts if the project
does not exit incubator for one thing...
-- dims
On 3/14/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Who needs to be convinced to see the
http://people.ap
Thanks! There is also the less severe problem with ezmlm stripping
attachments from some posts (see INFRA-1194). So far I haven't been
able to identify what causes them to be removed. Does anyone have
any ideas?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1194
Martin
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
O
Who needs to be convinced to see the
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/ directory
going away and incubating projects being allowed to put snapshots in
the snapshot repository and releases in the release repository?
Hen
Hi,
Woden and Tuscany have already proposed GSoC projects. Other
incubating projects might also be interested.
Notice the tight timeframe, if your project is interested then you
need to move quickly.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTE
25 matches
Mail list logo
