On 11/14/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri wrote:
> you need 3 PMC votes to release (or add a committer).
> You currently have 1 (Robert's).
Two. Dims voted tonight.
Since one vote was missing, I took the time to review the packages, and they
appear to have the necessary d
Henri wrote:
> you need 3 PMC votes to release (or add a committer).
> You currently have 1 (Robert's).
Two. Dims voted tonight.
Since one vote was missing, I took the time to review the packages, and they
appear to have the necessary disclaimer, etc., although the information in
the .WAR file
Luciano Resende wrote:
> LICENSE and NOTICE are available inside the war file at
> WEB-INF\classes\META-INF, please let me know if they are in the wrong
place.
Why not simply under sample-companyweb-1.0-incubator-M2.war#META-INF/, along
with the other files? That would be the expected location,
David E Jones wrote:
> If I understand correctly what you are saying there is one more step
> to take before we seek an approval vote from the Incubator PMC,
> namely creating and submitting a proposal to the Incubator PMC that
> they will send to the Apache Board for the whole TLP thing.
Yes, if
The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0 with a
total of 6 +1's.
The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~tabish/activemq-cpp-1.0.zip
And here's the wiki page for the release:
http://www.activemq.org/site/activemq-cpp-10-
On 11/14/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At this time you have, or will have, the required number of votes. We just
need to see the Board resolution.
I just sent a draft to the OFBiz mailing list. We'll have a
resolution posted here soon.
--
jaaron
-
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > Which part of the fact that only Incubator PMC member votes are binding
> > isn't clear? So far you have two (2). Again, so far.
> My understanding is that for the vote that took place on ofbiz-dev, we
> were counting OFBiz PPMC member votes as binding.
Binding has a sp
On 11/14/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for my own vote, -1 on a procedural basis:
> Based on early discussion about OFBiz at the ASF (around the time
> OFBiz entered the incubator) the best place for the project seems
> to be as a top level project (TLP). This is a separate
Gwyn Evans wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >Eelco,
> >
> >Here's the background: The current set of volunteers dealing with
> >infra always pushed back on a confluence install. *But* a very vocal
> >group demanded that it be installed and promised to maintain it. But
> >when the time comes, they
On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Probably. -1 is nice and bombastic and makes people pay attention (rob
me of my drama why don't you!).
Apologies ;-)
Said -1 is withdrawn when the vote is complete.
'nuff said.
Craig
Hen
On 11/14/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1 frome me. (belated)
On 11/14/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably. -1 is nice and bombastic and makes people pay attention (rob
me of my drama why don't you!).
Said -1 is withdrawn when the vote is complete.
Hen
On 11/14/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
Probably. -1 is nice and bombastic and makes people pay attention (rob
me of my drama why don't you!).
Said -1 is withdrawn when the vote is complete.
Hen
On 11/14/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Henri,
Point of order.
I don't believe that you really are voting -1 on the re
Hi Henri,
Point of order.
I don't believe that you really are voting -1 on the release. Rather,
you are pointing out that the vote is incomplete until 3 binding
votes of the Incubator PMC are received. I think there is a big
difference...
Craig
On Nov 14, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Henri Yandell
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 11/14/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> More than 72 hours have passed, and presumably everybody on the
>> incubator PMC that cares to vote has done so (Thanks Robert!). Please
>> proceed with the release.
>>
>> If anybody objects to this process, point them
On 11/14/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
More than 72 hours have passed, and presumably everybody on the
incubator PMC that cares to vote has done so (Thanks Robert!). Please
proceed with the release.
If anybody objects to this process, point them my way.
-1.
We don't release based o
-1 on the release.
The simple rule is - you need 3 PMC votes to release (or add a committer).
You currently have 1 (Robert's). That should be enough if Sam and Dims
(your mentors) vote; however they currently haven't voted on either
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread or the original.
Hen
On 11/14/06
Hi,
On 11/14/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which part of the fact that only Incubator PMC member votes are binding
isn't clear? So far you have two (2). Again, so far.
Perhaps I'm mistaken, but the vote on the OFBiz list was clearly about
internally deciding to request gradu
Hi,
On 11/14/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I counted 8 because Jacques was added as a committer during
incubation and is not yet part of the PMC. I'm not entirely sure
counting this way is correct, so I erred on the side of not including
his vote because we had plenty of other vot
Hi,
On 11/14/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The binding votes are from David E. Jones, Hans Bakker, Si Chen,
> Al Byers, Jacques Le Roux, Jacopo Cappellato, A. Zeneski, David
> Welton (a mentor), and myself (also a mentor), for a total of 9
> (not 8).
Which part of the fact th
On Nov 14, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 11/14/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those would be which ones? I do not see 8 binding votes (yet).
The voting thread from ofbiz-dev@incubator.apache.org is available at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubat
[ ] +1 Graduate OFBiz Podling
[ ] +0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Do not Graduate OFBiz Podling
+1
I think OFBiz is a fine open source community and project, and have
been consistently impressed by the people involved, and the job
they've done both technically and in dealing with the necessary
bureaucracy.
On Nov 14, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally
and agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator
The vote passed with 8 binding +1 votes
Those would be which ones? I do not see 8 binding votes (yet).
I
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I do not see 8 binding votes (yet).
> The voting thread from ofbiz-dev@incubator.apache.org is available at
Yes, I reviewed the entire thread looking.
> The binding votes are from David E. Jones, Hans Bakker, Si Chen,
> Al Byers, Jacques Le Roux,
Hi,
On 11/14/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Those would be which ones? I do not see 8 binding votes (yet).
The voting thread from ofbiz-dev@incubator.apache.org is available at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ofbiz-dev/200611.mbox/browser
It's in the Novemb
> The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally
> and agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator
> The vote passed with 8 binding +1 votes
Those would be which ones? I do not see 8 binding votes (yet).
As for my own vote, -1 on a procedural basis:
> Based o
More than 72 hours have passed, and presumably everybody on the
incubator PMC that cares to vote has done so (Thanks Robert!). Please
proceed with the release.
If anybody objects to this process, point them my way.
- Sam Ruby
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Ratify Tuscany
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:07 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hey folks,
I was able to finally get around to doing a binary release candidate
from the 4.1 branch.
it's available here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.1.0-RC2/m2-
incubating-repository/org/apache
On 11/14/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
People should be helping make SubWiki the best thing since
sliced breads instead of routinely having this discussion...
You mean this SubWiki?
* http://www.webdav.org/wiki/projects/SubWiki
* http://subwiki.tigris.org/
Though, if I wanted to
- doing with Trac what we orignally wanted to do with Subversion.
+ doing with Trac what we orignally wanted to do with SubWiki.
On 11/14/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's under the Apache License now and integrates with Subversion. A
reasonable idea would be look at merging the pro
Hi,
On 11/13/06, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally
and agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator based
on the Incubator Policy exit guidelines here:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Graduate OFBiz Podlin
David E Jones schrieb:
>
> The Apache Open For Business Project community has voted internally and
> agreed on readiness to graduate from the Apache Incubator based on the
> Incubator Policy exit guidelines here:
[..]
> Please cast your votes:
+1
Great diverse community which worked really h
For the record: JIRA made our users very happy. They have been asking
for it almost from the start and for some reason we always got
complaints about the SF issue tracker.
If only JIRA didn't mess with the subjects when sending updates for a
issue
johan
David Crossley wrote:
...
On xml-based projects there are problems due to many weird
filename extensions, so i use a different approach with
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/report_svn_text.pl
It scans for text files and reports which do not have "svn:eol-style native".
Tha
> Well, this was
> where the problem was then: we thought confluence was going to be
> supported, but was kind of in the beta phase.
Anyone use gmail? Anyone use it while it was still "beta"? :-)
Heh. I actually meant that ASF's support for Confluence was in beta.
Had we known (before spending
On Nov 9, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Allow me to make this clear.
Lol. Wow, that's a lot of opinions in one paragraph.
Heh.
Well, this was
where the problem was then: we thought confluence was going to be
supported, but was kind of in the beta phase.
Anyone use gmail? Anyon
35 matches
Mail list logo
