[X] +1 - Mark Lucene4c as dormant.
[ ] 0 - I have no opinion.
[ ] -1 - No, please keep it! [include reason]
Otis
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By contributing the documentation, you are assigning an non-exclusive,
non-revocable copywrite to that version of the material. If you are
also using the same material elsewhere, and also grant that entity a
copyright, that's OK, because the copyright to ASF is non-exclusive.
An essential questio
Thanks Yoav.
Eric, all: I don't have permission to modify the index.html file (at
http://lucene.apache.org/) to add a link to Lucene.Net so I am sending a
patch (see attached.)
Thanks.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yoav
Shap
remove nameprotect from
Key: INCUBATOR-48
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-48
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Bug
Components: site
Reporter: Ted Leung
Since nameprotect now
On 10/2/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
Apache ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0.2 release
binary. The last time release candidate was up for vote, it was
rejected due to issues with licence head
Hi,
Please don't replace the link yet. If you wish to add a link to
Lucene.Net in addition to the existing lucene4c one, have a blast
(though note I'm not in the lucene PMC). Dormancy doesn't quite mean
death yet: we will probably mark it as dormant, put up a notice,
redirect mailing lists, etc,
On 10/9/06, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you _really_ want to add this extra backdoor, then at least make it a
requirement that every bloody name has to be on the proposal and make
this backdoor expire at the end of incubation.
No argument on the "every bloody name has to be on th
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 08:21:50AM -0500, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Those people can be seeded as an 'initial
> emeritus list' and can simply regain access by asking for it again without
> having to prove themselves all over again. -- justin
>
I still think that's a bad idea. If they don't act
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And may I suggest that on the Lucene main page, here
http://lucene.apache.org/, we replace the link to Lucene4C to link to
Lucene.Net, which is http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/
I be happy to do this myself if someone will tell me where to find the page
to http://lucene.apache.org/ -- of cou
+1
Sorry to see Lucene4c go dormant, but here's to the success of Lucy!
Erik
On Oct 9, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board
On 10/9/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi robert,
I have a question regarding the Apache license header in some files in
our distribution. I have emailed the legal-discuss mailing list but
thought I would ask the general list also to see if I can get an
answer...
legal discu
On 10/9/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ X ] +1 - Mark Lucene4c as dormant.
> [ ] 0 - I have no opinion.
> [ ] -1 - No, please keep it! [include reason]
Will people have a post-ApacheCon todo / done list as well?
Hi,
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ X ] +1 - Mark Lucene4c as dormant.
[ ] 0 - I have no opinion.
[ ] -1 - No, please keep it! [include reason]
Will people have a post-ApacheCon todo / done list as well? I saw
this item on your preconference todo list ;)
Yoav
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board reports that just say "there has been no progress
in the last 3 months".
So, cast you
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board reports that just say "there has been no progress
in the last 3 months".
So, cast your votes now:
[ ] +1 - Mark Lucene4c as dormant.
[ ]
--On October 9, 2006 8:51:29 AM +0200 Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you want to give commit to people who don't even ask for it?
That seems like taking it a step too far for me.
If someone turns up 6 months down the line, I'm sure the people who came
with the podling will be quick to
If I am contributing documentation to a project using Confluence wiki,
but also need to write commercial documentation for a product based on
the Apache project what is the appropriate approach from a licensing
point of view? The commercial documentation will not be created using
Confluence, but in
Hi robert,
I have a question regarding the Apache license header in some files in
our distribution. I have emailed the legal-discuss mailing list but
thought I would ask the general list also to see if I can get an
answer...
1) idl.g - This file is from the antlr & is released under a bsd
license
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On October 4, 2006 8:05:17 AM +0100 david reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Feathercast is hoping to do an episode about the incubator, and for that
>> we'd like to talk to one or more projects that are undergoing
>> incubation. The idea is to get their story and
On Oct 8, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/8/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, in that case I would really like to see it that
if committers from other ASF projects read the proposal
and have a sincere interest in helping, that they be
included in the initi
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 08:52:56PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I disagree with filtering even inactive old contributors to an
> incoming project (at least for open source projects, I'm not sure how
> I feel with regard to inactive contributors to proprietary code that's
> being contributed). I
22 matches
Mail list logo
