Hey,
I just saw that Synapse has *similar* task, not same. It starts with
"If applicable, make ...".
Is this b/c there is no free section on nameprotect.com or no "apache account" ?
Thanks,
Matthias
On 7/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
Since the name "ADF Faces" is o
Hey Paul-
I just looked at your page [1] and saw a "DONE" before the task
If applicable, make sure that any associated name does not already
exist and check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not
already trademarked for an existing software product.
I'd like to do the same for th
On 7/6/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am spending many hours working through Apache processes so do you mind
if I ask a few questions:
For the graduation,
a.) what are the demographics of the commiters added to the project
in the community building and how/is this considered in
I am spending many hours working through Apache processes so do you mind
if I ask a few questions:
For the graduation,
a.) what are the demographics of the commiters added to the project
in the community building and how/is this considered in graduation?
b.) if there are committers on the pro
Well, not to chime in "me too" but in order to get up-to-speed
enough to cast a vote, I also looked over the archives, and
I saw a lot of code commits but little "online" development
as well... so it was hard to trace the commits to actual
community discussion and debate.
So I share Noel's concer
Noel
Firstly thanks for the scrutiny.
I agree that we've perhaps become a little quiet on the dev list. We
had some very intense discussions earlier this year and having got
over those and worked out a way forward we've just had plenty of
coding to do to implement the changes. I also agree that
Paul,
Before I vote, I'd like to ask you a community related question.
Looking at the June mail archives for Synapse (actually, I looked at other
months as well), I see a lot of commits but very little discussion. Yes,
some, but not much. More in May than in June, but a downtrend in mailing
lis
i've posted up a draft for a proposals guide document and also have in
preparation a guide to the entry process.
i think that it would be a good idea to make the policy document
(http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html) a
little more concise and maybe move some discursive ma
+1 for graduation and +1 for closing the vote. The normal period is 72
hours, so 10 days is within the margin of error.
Sanjiva.
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 10:13 +0100, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> This vote has now been running for 10 days. We have 4 +1s of which 3
> are binding:
>
> Roy Fielding +1
> Da
On Jul 5, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Adinarayana Sakala wrote:
Hi Jim,
We are definetely committed to build the project and community at
Apache. So, Any and all new development will happen at Apache. That
said, as i indicated in my email before there might be a need to do
some bug fixes and maybe point
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 04:12:46PM -0700, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Every podling has eventual extra incubation docs under:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/podlingname/**
>
> What sort of documentation do you mean by that?
I think what is meant are things like the status file, legal doc
This vote has now been running for 10 days. We have 4 +1s of which 3
are binding:
Roy Fielding +1
Davanum Srinivas +1
Ant Elder (non-binding) +1
Paul Fremantle +1
I am happy for this vote to continue - as long as the time is actually
being used productively.
If everyone has had enough time to s
I didn't have a problem with Heraldry, nor do I care if its name is changed.
But although Ibid may have "a good geeky literary reference", I concur that
it sounds like an eBay interface for an iPAQ or iPod.
--- Noel
-
To
13 matches
Mail list logo