Re: licensing issues in clucene

2006-04-29 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 29 April 2006 02:57, Ben van Klinken wrote: > For historical reasons, CLucene is dual licensed as Apache 2.0 license > or LGPL. As I understand it, the apache license is currently is not > compatible with GPL projects and therefore GPL projects can't > distribute apache licensed softwar

RE: licensing issues in clucene

2006-04-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
You might want to contact the Lucene project (Lucene long ago left Jakarta). Also, see: http://incubator.apache.org/lucene4c/. > As I understand it, the apache license is currently is not > compatible with GPL projects and therefore GPL projects can't > distribute apache licensed software Opinion

licensing issues in clucene

2006-04-29 Thread Ben van Klinken
Hi, I am the lead developer for CLucene, an open source search engine based on Apache Lucene. We recently fixed some of our licensing issues we were having (code that wasn't license-incompatible) and are trying comply properly with all our licensing. We have been invited to apply for incubation a

Re: VOTE: Release Roller 2.2-incubating

2006-04-29 Thread Henri Yandell
On 4/28/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on Apache infrastructure this time. Let me know if I can help on the copyright side. On the release side - I do