On 3/2/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hola,
>
> > He was referring to the discussion on the db-general list.
> > I've started a vote on the DB PMC list which ends on Sunday, so let's
> > postpone this discussion until then. I'll post the results on Monday.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Tom
>
Hola,
> He was referring to the discussion on the db-general list.
> I've started a vote on the DB PMC list which ends on Sunday, so let's
> postpone this discussion until then. I'll post the results on Monday.
>
> cheers,
> Tom
Good, thank you.
Yoav
On 3/2/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion with the
> > Incubator PMC vote. As far as I can tell it is resolved now. Everybody
> > involved from Cayenne, Incubator, and DB are in favor of DB PMC to be
> > the Sponsor
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Geir,
>
> I don't think there is any contradiction between your post and what
> Mike was saying. If you look at the thread context, we are still
> talking about how to move with the incubation sponsorship.
>
> More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion w
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > Yes, we've already discussed this in the cayenne community and are in
> > agreement that while we'd prefer TLP, we're ok with being under DB or
> > Geronimo.
>
On 3/2/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geronimo? Sheesh.
>
> The issue now is incubatio
On Mar 2, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to
DB, but is this consistent with the fact that we have no final
decision on how Cayenne will graduate from the incubator (as TLP or
DB subproject)?
You cannot actually do
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion with the
> Incubator PMC vote. As far as I can tell it is resolved now.
> Everybody involved from Cayenne, Incubator, and DB are in favor of DB
> PMC to be the Sponsor.
Ok, then I'll
+1 (non-binding)
Regardless of whether DB or Incubator is the official sponsor of this
project, I think it has merit and increases the footprint of Apache
in the ORM space. Go for it.
Craig
On Mar 2, 2006, at 1:31 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposa
Geir,
I don't think there is any contradiction between your post and what
Mike was saying. If you look at the thread context, we are still
talking about how to move with the incubation sponsorship.
More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion with the
Incubator PMC vote. As
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
Yes, we've already discussed this in the cayenne community and are in
agreement that while we'd prefer TLP, we're ok with being under DB or
Geronimo.
Geronimo? Sheesh.
The issue now is incubation sponsorship, which is independent of landing
spot after graduation.
Yes, we've already discussed this in the cayenne community and are in
agreement that while we'd prefer TLP, we're ok with being under DB or
Geronimo.
-Mike
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted,
>
> The community has been aware of our two graduation options. The issue
> of s
Ted,
The community has been aware of our two graduation options. The issue
of sponsorship, albeit the important one, doesn't change the goal of
the proposal. Cris just posted a note to our committer list to inform
everybody who is not watching [EMAIL PROTECTED] of the current
developments
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This (and what Jim said a few minutes ago) is consistent with my
> understanding of the current situation. I just made changes to the
> proposal on Wiki to reflect that DB PMC is a sponsor. See this link
> with highlighted changes:
>
> http://
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/2/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has the DB project voted to accept the sponsorship?
If DB is going to be the sponsor, then another vote by the Incubator
PMC is unnecessary.
Not AFAIK. I for one would be in favor of having t
On 3/2/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has the DB project voted to accept the sponsorship?
>
> If DB is going to be the sponsor, then another vote by the Incubator
> PMC is unnecessary.
Not AFAIK. I for one would be in favor of having the DB PMC sponsor
Cayenne because it fits there (
Has the DB project voted to accept the sponsorship?
If DB is going to be the sponsor, then another vote by the Incubator
PMC is unnecessary.
-Ted.
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to DB,
> but is this consiste
On Mar 2, 2006, at 9:12 AM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
No negative feedback, bu
Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to DB,
but is this consistent with the fact that we have no final decision
on how Cayenne will graduate from the incubator (as TLP or DB
subproject)?
Andrus
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/2/06, Andrus
On Mar 2, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
No negative feedback, bu
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
> any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
> move ahead with the process.
Mhm, why is the Incubator PMC now the sponsor instead of the DB PMC ?
> On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
> > any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
> > move ahead with the process.
>
> No negative feedback, but I thought we agreed on the DB proje
Hola,
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
> any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
> move ahead with the process.
No negative feedback, but I thought we agreed on the DB project
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Trustin
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
--
PGP key fingerprints:
* E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E
* B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
+1
-Ted.
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
> any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
> move ahead with the process.
>
> See the latest proposal text below.
>
> Andrus
--
I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
move ahead with the process.
See the latest proposal text below.
Andrus
---
Cayenne Incubator Proposal
Sect
25 matches
Mail list logo
