> Mike Kienenberger wrote: > > Yes, we've already discussed this in the cayenne community and are in > > agreement that while we'd prefer TLP, we're ok with being under DB or > > Geronimo. >
On 3/2/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Geronimo? Sheesh. > > The issue now is incubation sponsorship, which is independent of landing > spot after graduation. > > Lets just resolve the sponsorship issue and move from there. Yes, my point is that the Cayenne community has discussed a variety of options and we're open to any of those we discussed (TLP, DB, Geronimo, Jakarta). Maybe we should go with Jakarta/Velocity instead? :) After all, we make heavy use of Velocity and other commons projects. We could do the "is it a component/framework thing?" as well as the best of you :) Lots of synergy there :) Calm down, just kidding :) -Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
