Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Maven-ized the commons projects just a bit, just enough for the pages
> to show up for each project (except UTIL as it is using m2 and Guthila
> as i don't know what to do there).
The web site for commons/util is already in place. Is it desirable to
have it within a comm
On Jan 31, 2006, at 1:59 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It would be kind of ironic if having complained about Forrest,
when the
Forrest team were so helpful and active here, that after
converting to
anakia, no one is around to help with the new process.
Something that i
If I understand correctly, this will be a code donation like
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/geronimo-762-ibm-console.html.
Regards,
Alan
On 2/2/2006 1:12 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Cory,
Could you please get James' help and draft a complete proposal?
Please see
http://www.goog
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Following literal directions in projects/incubation-status-template.xml
:-?
With the conversion of the incubator site to anakia this instruction
needs to be removed:
add this page in incubator/site-author/site.xml as for other projects
and these html files nee
On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
As you know, this is a project that I would like to see moving into
the ASF,
and Geronimo (in this case) is actually where it does belong, but ...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Would you PLEASE re
Following literal directions in projects/incubation-status-template.xml
:-?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cory,
Could you please get James' help and draft a complete proposal?
Please see
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=incubator+proposal+site%3Awiki.apache.org&btnG=Search
for a list of proposals, their format and their content.
Once the proposal is ready, please post it to [EMAIL
James Strachan wrote:
> Given it fits nicely with the existing ServiceMix incubation
> proposal I see no need for a new proposal for a donation of
> code to an existing incubating project.
We don't start to incubate a chicken, and then import a barnyard under the
same proposal, just because it fi
On Feb 2, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
What I SEEM to recall is that we agree that people were not to
publish into
one of the public Maven repositories, and that was to be a separate
repository for use with the Incubator, so that users would be
required to
knowingly configure th
David Blevins wrote:
As you know, this is a project that I would like to see moving into the ASF,
and Geronimo (in this case) is actually where it does belong, but ...
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Would you PLEASE revise whatever template you guys are copying from:
> New S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Strachan wrote:
>
> We were first voting to see if the servicemix community and geronimo
> PMC were willing to accept the donation. Given it fits nicely with
> the existing ServiceMix incubation proposal I see no need for a new
> proposal
Should have sent this email a much earlier as we voted quite some
time ago. Anyway,
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
The Geronimo project has voted to be the sponsor of the OpenEJB.
The vot
James,
With my Geronimo PMC member hat on. i've already cast my VOTE
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=113889773909505&w=2).
Now that i have your attention :) and i have a bit more information
that i did not have before, but i still think a standalone BPEL
vibrant project is a neces
On 2 Feb 2006, at 18:36, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
There is no proposal, there is just a zip, unless someone is a
clairvoyant, we can't figure out things like.
We were first voting to see if the servicemix community and geronimo
PMC were willing to accept the donation. Given it fits nic
On 2 Feb 2006, at 18:27, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Wilkins wrote:
+1
I disagree that all contributions must go via the incubator. This is
clearly within the scope of servicemix and there is no need to
develope a community around this code
Folks,
There is no proposal, there is just a zip, unless someone is a
clairvoyant, we can't figure out things like. *PLEASE* CC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Which specific version of the spec is implemented?
- Where are the list of known issues?
- Where is the TODO list?
- Why is Axis version 1.2 RC1 (and
Seems as though no one has any objections to Ohana.
Neil Stein
-Original Message-
From: Stein, Neil S
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 7:48 AM
To: 'general@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Incubate TMCg2
>As I've said it before, TMC doesn't do the trick for me -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Wilkins wrote:
> +1
>
> I disagree that all contributions must go via the incubator. This is
> clearly within the scope of servicemix and there is no need to
> develope a community around this code.
So who's going to be working on it, then? T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
>>I disagree that all contributions must go via the incubator.
>
> Ah, but all contributions of any size require incubator
> involvement to some degree or other.
>
>>This is clearly within the sc
On 2/2/2006 8:57 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How should the disclaimer be associated?
Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars
available? To
allow automated downloads by
On Feb 2, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How should the disclaimer be associated?
Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars
available? To
allow automated downloads by Maven? I have an issue with that,
since it
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > allow automated downloads by Maven? I have an issue with that,
> > since it could allow people to use the code without knowing
> > that it is in the Incubator, but more to the point, we've had
> > that discussion, and I don't recall the re
Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>
>>> How should the disclaimer be associated?
>>
>>
>> Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars available? To
>> allow automated downloads by Maven? I have an issue with that, since it
>> could al
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How should the disclaimer be associated?
Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars
available? To
allow automated downloads by Maven? I have an issue with that,
since it
could allow people to use the code without knowin
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 2/1/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could someone kindly describe (or point us to a document explaining)
how to reset a user password at people.apache.org?
i don't that this is documented anywhere (or indeed whether there's
concensus about the rig
On 2/1/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could someone kindly describe (or point us to a document explaining)
> how to reset a user password at people.apache.org?
i don't that this is documented anywhere (or indeed whether there's
concensus about the right way to do this).
but infr
On 2/2/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> James Strachan wrote:
> How should the disclaimer be associated?
>
> Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars available? To
> allow automated downloads by Maven? I have an issue with that, since it
> could allow people
27 matches
Mail list logo
