APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> Doesn't Derby have at least three independent committers?
> There's Jeremy and the IBM folks...who's the other one?
As far as I know, Jeremy is the only non-IBM Committer to Derby.
--- Noel
-
To u
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:44:40 -0500, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> > the committer diversity issue has been raised as an issue by
> > at least a couple folks. While it looks like they meet the
> > requirement to have committers from at least three independent
>
David Crossley wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I believe a 'svn up' needs to be run by someone on minutaur (perhaps in
/www/incubator.apache.org?), then you need to wait for the sync job to
copy the results over to the current web server (ajax?).
Thanks for clarifying. I just did that 'svn up' so n
Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> I believe a 'svn up' needs to be run by someone on minutaur (perhaps in
> /www/incubator.apache.org?), then you need to wait for the sync job to
> copy the results over to the current web server (ajax?).
Thanks for clarifying. I just did that 'svn up' so now we need to
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I updated the page and was waiting for site regeneration but thought
I would give it a go.
I already re-generated the page and committed it to svn yesterday.
With the infrastructure changes is minotaur still t
Garrett Rooney wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I updated the page and was waiting for site regeneration but thought
I would give it a go.
I already re-generated the page and committed it to svn yesterday.
With the infrastructure changes is minotaur still the right host to use?
David Crossley wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I updated the page and was waiting for site regeneration but thought I
would give it a go.
I already re-generated the page and committed it to svn yesterday.
With the infrastructure changes is minotaur still the right host to use?
I am confused about t
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> I updated the page and was waiting for site regeneration but thought I
> would give it a go.
I already re-generated the page and committed it to svn yesterday.
> With the infrastructure changes is minotaur still the right host to use?
I am confused about this too. In the
I updated the page and was waiting for site regeneration but thought I
would give it a go.
With the infrastructure changes is minotaur still the right host to use?
--
Jeremy
Original Message
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Derby from the incubator
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:13:26 -0
vetos must be justified... An unjustified veto is
worthless.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Mar 29, 2005, at 9:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Er, just a vote -- there is no veto for this type of decision.
Actually, althought it has never been necessary to address so far, I do
recall discussion of a -1 veto option graduation. Yes, it is a poli
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I vote -0. Ideally, a more diverse group of contributors
would alleviate concerns, or at least some plan of
action, post-graduation, which would address those
concerns.
There is a plan in place to do this which would continue after graduation.
There are currently several people
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Actually, I agree with you, and others have expressed the same concern,
although without casting a vote. Adding new Committers is probably the #1
issue facing the Derby project, which has otherwise performed excellently to
date. As even Jeremy pointed out, were IBM to withd
On Mar 29, 2005, at 9:44 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Er, just a vote -- there is no veto for this type of decision.
Actually, althought it has never been necessary to address so far, I do
recall discussion of a -1 veto option graduation. Yes, it is a policy
decision, but it e
At 04:44 AM 3/30/2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Er, just a vote -- there is no veto for this type of decision.
Actually, althought it has never been necessary to address so far, I do
recall discussion of a -1 veto option graduation. Yes, it is a policy
decision, but it effec
I vote -0. Ideally, a more diverse group of contributors
would alleviate concerns, or at least some plan of
action, post-graduation, which would address those
concerns.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Er, just a vote -- there is no veto for this type of decision.
Actually, althought it has never been necessary to address so far, I do
recall discussion of a -1 veto option graduation. Yes, it is a policy
decision, but it effects importing code under
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> decision, but it effects importing code under the auspices of the
> Foundation, and it isn't unreasonable to have a higher bar.
I'd rather then have an escalation onto a higher bar (sush as a 2/3) or
some deferal to board/members at the next general
19 matches
Mail list logo
