Yep, I agree with that. And if that's the choice, the two codebases
should be merged ASAP too. The more we wait, the more painful the
merging will be. I wouldn't like having to throw away half of
Twister's code in the process...
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 03:14:23 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hiya,
Just added the logo to the directory project in the incubator:
http://incubator.apache.org/directory
This will go away the next time the site is generated and published.
Basically the changes have been made only to the cvs repo holding the
generated files.
If anyone else has a maven gene
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for your interest in JCMS. We (the JCMS team) plan to start this kind of
discussion on Slide & JackRabbit mailing lists but Incubator is certainly the right
place to do that.
The main JCMS goals are :
1.Group together different kind of content servers in order to aggrate th
hi oli,
thanks for your comments. i really appreciate your interest.
> first of all let me say that I really appreciate your help! Second,
> let me say that I have no reservations concerning Jackrabbit and
> certainly do not see it as a threat to Slide or the other way round
> (which others seeme
Hi David,
first of all let me say that I really appreciate your help! Second,
let me say that I have no reservations concerning Jackrabbit and
certainly do not see it as a threat to Slide or the other way round
(which others seemed to feel in other posts), but rather want to
explore where each pro
hi oliver,
> (1) Where can I get the (tentative) JCR API?
you can download the snapshot that was out for public review
in may-2004
( http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/review/jsr170/index.html )
which is a quite a bit outdated now. or you can get the binaries that
are used by maven to buil
Two (maybe dumb) questions
(1) Where can I get the (tentative) JCR API?
(2) When *presumably* will Jackrabbit be mature enought to be an
alternative to the current Slide backend?
Oliver
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:41:49 -0800, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no problem. There i
On Oct 29, 2004, at 4:43 PM, Paul Russell wrote:
Guys,
On 26 Oct 2004, at 09:02, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Oct 26, 2004, at 3:27 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
Very practically, what is the conclusion of this discussion ? :)
Not sure if one is required. I don't think solving the TLP problem
is a goo
