hammett wrote:
> if we should have a strong community to enter incubator,
> then we will have to wait a few months :-(
As much as I'd like to see us able to facilitate community growth within the
Incubator, given the limited human resources available, particularly it
seems these days, there are g
+1 for one project (then we'll see what happends :)
-- dims
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:21:33 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Paul Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > I'm /so/ +1 for this (the TLP bit -- you /know/ I'm +1 the rest of it
> > too!) it's making me late
"Paul Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I'm /so/ +1 for this (the TLP bit -- you /know/ I'm +1 the rest of it
> too!) it's making me late for work! My day job involves working for a
> large enterprise (the largest insurer in the UK). To large
> organisations like that, visibility is ever
Guys,
On 22 Oct 2004, at 02:13, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Oct 21, 2004, at 4:20 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
"Geir Magnusson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think that bringing the two concepts together - workflow and WS
orchestration - would be a great goal :)
So as a co-author of BPEL I hav
Geir, I absolutely agree with your point that this would be a stronger
community and a better software stack if we could bring all together
into one project. And that was exactly the point of my initial
proposal. I was just expressing the fact that a web-service (WSDL and
XML messaging) based engin
