[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack Reviewer:

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-09

viewer: Ron Bonica Review Date: 2016-09-29 IETF LC End Date: 2016-11-08 IETF Telechat Date: 2016-09-15 Summary: This document is ready for publication. Major Issues: None Minor Issues

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04.txt

Francis, Thanks for the careful review. Can you suggest a better title? Ron P.S. I have worked the other comments into the next version of the draft. > -Original Message- > From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cerveny, Bill >

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-nd-04.txt

Hi Jari, Sorry for the slow response. We worked all of Francis' comments into the draft except for one. In his first comment, Francis suggests that the title is misleading. We asked for a better title but got no response. If Francis can recommend a better title, there is still time to change it

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

Folks, The following is status for draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host: - WG last call complete - OPSDIR, GENART and INTDIR reviews complete - write-up complete The following issue was raised in the GENART Review: " The proposed status seems questionable. We as a community are not re

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

Gunter, Thanks much. A brief chat with Joel may clear this up. Ron > -Original Message- > From: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) > [mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com] > Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:47 AM > To: Ron Bonica ; d

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

Wfm Joel, are you ok with this? Ron > -Original Message- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 4:06 PM > To: Ron Bonica ; Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - > BE/Antwerp) ; draft-ietf-v6ops-unique- &g

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

Joel, Are you OK with the change that Brian recommends, below? Ron > -Original Message- > From: Ron Bonica > Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 8:36 PM > To: 'Brian E Carpenter' ; Van De Velde, > Gunter (No

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host

From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com] > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 8:31 PM > To: Brzozowski, John ; Ron Bonica > ; Brian E Carpenter ; > Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) > ; draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix- > per-host@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org &g

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-intarea-probe-07

Hi Joel, Thanks for the review. Responses inline.. Ron > -Original Message- > From: Joel Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 4:45 PM > To: gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-intarea-probe@ietf.org; int-a...@

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-intarea-probe-07

] > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 4:19 PM > To: Ron Bonica ; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-intarea-probe@ietf.org; int-a...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-intarea-probe-07 > > Thank you Ron. > > On the E-bit (or P-Bit), is

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-intarea-probe-07

faces. Ron > -Original Message- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 6:24 AM > To: Ron Bonica ; Joel M. Halpern > ; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-intarea-probe@ietf.org; int-a...@

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-intarea-probe-07

Works for me. > -Original Message- > From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:19 PM > To: Ron Bonica ; Joel M. Halpern > ; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-intarea-probe@ietf.org; int-a...@ietf.org; i...@ie

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04

Thanks! > -Original Message- > From: Wassim Haddad > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 4:41 PM > To: gen-art > Cc: Wassim Haddad ; draft-ietf-v6ops- > conditional-ras@ietf.org > Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09

Attached is my review of the specified document, submitted as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Document: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09.txt Comments: The docum

[Gen-art] [Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-ecp-groups]

resend Original Message Subject: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-ecp-groups Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:49:17 -0400 From: Ron Bonica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Folks, The following are a few comments: - Plea

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipfix-architecture

This document is well written and ready for publication. -r ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art reveiw of draft-ietf-pce-discovery-reqs-04

Background for those who may be unaware of GenART: GenART is the Area Review Team for the General Area of the IETF. We advise the General Area Director (i.e. the IETF/IESG chair) by providing more in depth reviews than he could do himself of documents that come up for final decision in IESG telech

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-10

James, Thanks for making clarification to your draft. My comments on the draft are cleared. Ron ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05 / draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for: draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05 -and- draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05 For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last

[Gen-art] Re: Genart review of draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-server-mib-05 / draft-ietf-radext-dynauth-client-mib-05

Ok. In that case, you are fine. The MIB Rx is the MIB Doctor Review group. Your AD will introduce you to them somewhere in the process. Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Ron, > > Thanks for the review, see below for some answers > > Ron Bonica wro

[Gen-art] Genart review for draft-ietf-pkix-lightweight-ocsp-profile-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Re: Genart review for draft-ietf-pkix-lightweight-ocsp-profile-05

OK. I guess you have addressed all of my comments. -r Deacon, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your comments. My responses are included inline. > > >>-Original Message----- >>From: Ron Bonica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Wedne

[Gen-art] Genart review for draft-ietf-ipfix-info-12

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

[Gen-art] Re: Genart review for draft-ietf-ipfix-info-12

I have no further comments on this document. -ron Ron Bonica wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG > telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-crisp-iris-common-transport-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . IMO, this draft is well written and ready for publication. Can I assume that this schema is already de

[Gen-art] Re: draft-ietf-crisp-iris-common-transport-03

Resend. There was a small cut-and-paste error on the last attempt. -r Ron Bonica wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG > telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf

[Gen-art] Genart Review for draft-ietf-dkim-base-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . IMO, this draft is very will thought out and ready for publication. R

Re: [Gen-art] Genart Review for draft-ietf-dkim-base-06

err... make that very well thought out... Ron Bonica wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG > telechat agenda. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. > > IMO, th

[Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-crisp-iris-common-transport-04

Hi Andy, I have been assigned the genart reveiw of draft-ietf-crisp-iris-common-transport-04. In general, I think that it is ready for publication. However, I would like to ask if there are any deployed implementations? Ron ___

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-bonica-internet-icmp-14

Hi Sharon, Thanks for the thoughtful review. Lots of responses inline, below. I have attached a new version of the draft which I will post in a bit. Ron Sharon Chisholm wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer > for this

[Gen-art] draft-bonica-internet-icmp-16

Folks, Please accept version 16 of this draft. I catches a few nits that were left on version 15 (submitted last night). Ron Internet R. Bonica Internet-DraftD

[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-mpls-icmp-08.txt

Francis, Yes, I also wish that we could have applied the ICMP extensions to the ICMPv6 Packet Too Big message. Unfortunately, there are no unused bits in that message. So, we couldn't add a length attribute. And without a length attribute, we couldn't add an extension structure.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bmwg-mpls-forwarding-meth-05.txt

Could we address this issue dispensing with 2119 language altogether (i.e. convert to lower case). Ron Brian E Carpenter wrote: > ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-05.txt

n has been minimal. There has been extensive comments on this proposal during the working group meetings. Personnel Lenny Giuliano is the Document Shepherd, Ron Bonica is the Responsible Area Director. RFC Editor Note (Insert RFC Editor Note here or remove section) IRTF Note (I

[Gen-art] Re: [IPv6]Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-01

Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 11:10 AM To: 'Ron Bonica' ; gen-art@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar Cc: draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [IPv6]Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-01 I concur with Ron while partly agr

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-01

Linda, I think that you are assuming the PE's are always routers. They can be hosts that support VPN. In fact, this is the most likely use-case. These days, most routers support MPLS. So, MPLS VPNs suffice. There is no need for an alternative forwarding plane. The only case where you need an

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert-06

Mallory, Thanks for your careful review. Version 07 (just posted) addresses your comments. Ron Juniper Business Use Only From: Mallory Knodel via Datatracker Sent: Wednesday, February 12

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert-06

Sorry. It is addressed in version 08 Ron Juniper Business Use Only From: Ron Bonica Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 3:20 PM To: gen-art@ietf.org ; Mallory Knodel Cc: draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert@ietf.org