le to receive packets. This includes currently
established DTLS associations as well as any DTLS association which were
closed but can still receive packets due to network transmission delays.
Regards,
_
Roman Shpount
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Hi Christer,
This sounds good to me.
Regards,
_
Roman Shpount
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
>
>
> What about:
>
>
>
> “…media packets in the any previously established DT
Thank you!
_
Roman Shpount
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair. Please wait for direc
preferred over legacy implementations of RFC 4091 and RFC 4092.
Best Regards,
_
Roman Shpount
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 12:00 PM Alissa Cooper wrote:
> Stewart, thanks for your review. I entered a DISCUSS ballot to check on
> the obsoleted references to RFC 4091 and RFC 4092.
>
Stewart and Alissa,
I have reviewed Chister's response for this issue and re-read RFC4091/4092,
and now agree with Christer: We can remove the section about ANAT and
references to RFC4091/4092.
Best Regards,
_
Roman Shpount
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 12:52 PM Roman Shpount
