Hi Christer, This sounds good to me.
Regards, _____________ Roman Shpount On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Christer Holmberg < christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi Roman, > > > > What about: > > > > “…media packets in the any previously established DTLS association and…” > > > > That covers both the currently established and already closed associations. > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > *From:* Roman Shpount [mailto:ro...@telurix.com] > *Sent:* 28 March 2017 02:58 > *To:* Christer Holmberg <christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> > *Cc:* Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu>; draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp. > a...@ietf.org; General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>; IETF MMUSIC WG > <mmu...@ietf.org> > *Subject:* Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of > draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22 > > > > Hi All, > > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Christer Holmberg < > christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > >Regarding the following in section 5.1: > > > > When an offerer or answerer indicates that it wants to establish a > > new DTLS association, it needs to make sure that media packets in the > > existing DTLS association and new DTLS association can be de- > > multiplexed. > > > >This text presumes there is an existing association. To explicitly cover > the case where there is not, I suggest the following: > > > > When an offerer or answerer indicates that it wants to establish a > > new DTLS association to replace an existing association, it needs to > > ensure that media packets in the existing DTLS association and new > > DTLS association can be de-multiplexed. > > I could do that. Or, I could use say "make sure that media packets in > *any* existing DTLS association" > > > > If we are nitpicking we need to define what "existing" DTLS association > means here. In this particular case this means any DTLS association for > which it still possible to receive packets. This includes currently > established DTLS associations as well as any DTLS association which were > closed but can still receive packets due to network transmission delays. > > > > Regards, > > _____________ > Roman Shpount > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
