[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review for draft-cotton-rfc4020bis-01

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2013-09-11 IETF LC End Date: 2013-09-24 IESG Telechat date: not scheduled Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review. (That summary was taken from the options in RFC6385. I would prefer to say "There is one minor is

Re: [Gen-art] [netext] Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07

Hi Suresh - It doesn't look like any of these changes made it into -08? RjS On 8/22/13 4:51 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: On 8/22/13 4:06 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Hi Robert, Thanks a lot for the review. We will include the changes in the next revision we submit. Please see proposed ch

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-08

netext-update-notifications-08 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2013-09-24 IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-29 IESG Telechat date: 2013-09-26 Summary: This draft is (still) ready for publication as Proposed Standard, but there are nits the editors agreed to fix that have not yet been addressed. On 8/2

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-27

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 30 September 2013 IETF LC End Date: 1 October 2013 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: Basically ready for publication as a BCP (but there are some LC discussions that should be reflected before ap

[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3-09

9v3-09 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 11-Oct-2013 IETF LC End Date: 16-Oct-2013 IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. This document is dense (as in it puts a

[Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-art last call review: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11

missed copying gen-art Original Message Subject:Gen-art last call review: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:57:45 -0600 From: Robert Sparks To: p...@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constrai...@tools.ietf.org I am the assigned

[Gen-art] Gen-art last call review: draft-housley-ct-keypackage-receipt-n-error-05

eipt-n-error-05 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 26 Nov 2013 IETF LC End Date: 27 Nov 2013 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled Summary: Ready Two nit-level comments: I found the formulation 'The key package error content type MUST be signed if the entity generating it is capable of

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-06

bis-06 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2 Dec 2013 IETF LC End Date: 10 Dec 2013 IESG Telechat date: not scheduled Summary: Ready ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-06

opsawg-rfc5066bis-07 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2 Dec 2013 IETF LC End Date: 10 Dec 2013 IESG Telechat date: 19 Dec 2013 Summary: Ready ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11

vendor-constraints-11 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 13-Dec-2013 IETF LC End Date: 9-Dec-2013 IESG Telechat date: 19-Dec-2013 Summary: Ready Adrian responded to my LC comments on this version of the draft, but only copied the authors and the pce wg. If you're curious, and not already

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11

On 12/13/13 1:42 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new vers

[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-moving-iana-registries

stries Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 16-Jan-2014 IETF LC End Date: 17-Jan-2014 IESG Telechat date: 23-Jan-2014 Summary: This document is ready for publication as Proposed Standard ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-crocker-id-adoption-05

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 16-Jan-2014 IETF LC End Date: 31-Jan-2014 IESG Telechat date: 6-Feb-2014 Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/li

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pcp-nat64-prefix64-04

x64-04 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 3-Jan-2014 IETF LC End Date: 4-Jan-2014 IESG Telechat date: Unknown Summary: Ready with Nits Nits/editorial comments: There are several references to expired drafts (some very expired). If those are not going to progress, the details you wanted to call out

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 11Mar2014 IETF LC End Date: 12Mar2014 IESG Telechat date: 27Mar2014 Summary: Ready with nits This is a solid document, and its development has left good artifacts showing a pattern of careful review. (such as <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/jcardcal/trac

Re: [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09

Actually, there are perhaps some corners to consider knocking off related to: * I verified that the syntax numbers with fractional parts is the same in both iCal in jCal. Specifically "4." is not valid in either grammar, so there is no need to discuss something like adding a 0 or remove the dec

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08

lan-08 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 20 Mar 2014 IETF LC End Date: 24 Mar 2014 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document is not ready for publication as an Experimental IETF Stream RFC (Apologies to the everyone on the long list of authors - this rev

Re: [Gen-art] [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09

Inline On 3/20/14, 3:32 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote: Hi Robert, Thank you for your valuable comments. I agree with moving the reference to RFC4627 to normative, as already discussed. Done. Please consider adding a reference to clarify "JSON escaping" where it is mentioned in the 2nd paragraph

Re: [Gen-art] [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09

On 3/20/14, 3:39 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote: On 3/11/14, 8:06 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: Actually, there are perhaps some corners to consider knocking off related to: * I verified that the syntax numbers with fractional parts is the same in both iCal in jCal. Specifically "4." is no

Re: [Gen-art] [Jcardcal] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-jcardcal-jcal-09

wrote: On 3/21/14, 2:16 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: On 3/20/14, 6:26 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote: On 3/20/14, 11:20 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: value-separator is defined in section 2 of rfc 7159. Provide that reference at the point it's used in the document please. Just above the ABNF in the

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-11

opt-11 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 7Apr2014 IETF LC End Date: 8Apr2014 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard, but has minor issues (primarily editorial) that should be addressed. I found this document very diffic

[Gen-art] Genart LC and telechat review: draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update-04

ate-04 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 9-May-2014 IETF LC End Date: 12-May-2014 IESG Telechat date: 15-May-2014 Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC Thanks for a well constructed document! It's in good enough shape that it invites very small polishing sugges

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-05

rprise-incremental-ipv6-05 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 5 June 2014 IETF LC End Date: 9 June 2014 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but has nits that should be considered before publication. I had a mixed o

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-11

atest draft which I will distribute and check with authors and ADs and Chairs shortly. Don. -Original Message- From: L2vpn [mailto:l2vpn-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 3:41 PM To: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-...@tool

Re: [Gen-art] [v6ops] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-05

, at 20:00, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Docu

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-secretaries-good-practices-06

ces-06 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 1 July 2014 IETF LC End Date: 10 July 2014 IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft is not ready for publication as a Best Current Practice The draft is currently targeting BCP in order to update the descriptio

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-paws-protocol-12

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 3 July, 2014 IETF LC End Date: 7 July, 2014 IESG Telechat date: 10 July, 2014 Summary: This document is not ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. I apologize in advance if I've missed where one of the questions below is already answered. There's

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00

nts-00 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 20-Jul-2014 IETF LC End Date: 25-Jul-2014 IESG Telechat date: 7-Aug-2014 Summary: Basically ready for publication, but with process nits for the group and the IESG to consider Thanks for assembling such a clearly written document. The shepherd writeup

Re: [Gen-art] [Isis-wg] Gen-art LC review draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00

On 7/20/14, 11:04 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote: Robert - -Original Message- From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 7:27 AM To: draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoi...@tools.ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org; General Area Review Team

Re: [Gen-art] [Isis-wg] Gen-art LC review draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00

Thanks Les - Robert - -Original Message- From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com] Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 8:14 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoi...@tools.ietf.org; isis...@ietf.org; General Area Review Team Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] Gen-art LC

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12

ech-12 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 5-Aug-2014 IETF LC End Date: 8-Aug-2014 IESG Telechat date: Not on an upcoming telechat agenda Summary: Ready for publication as Informational This document handles a complex description problem in a very accessible way. Thank you for the effort that ha

[Gen-art] Genart LC review draft-ietf-paws-protocol-14 (was Re: Second Last Call: (Protocol to Access White-Space (PAWS) Databases) to Proposed Standard)

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 6-Aug-2014 IETF LC End Date: 20-Aug-2014 IESG Telechat date: 21-Aug-2014 Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard Version -14 addresses the concerns I raised with -12. Thanks again to the WG and the authors for such quick and effective responses. RjS

Re: [Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-12

=== Regards Bob Briscoe & Matt Mathis On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Robert Sparks <mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com>> wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-09

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 21 Aug 2014 IETF LC End Date: 26 Aug 2014 IESG Telechat date: 2 Oct 2014 Summary: Ready (with nits) for publication as Experimental. David's shepherd writeup points out that implementation and usage experience is desired before producing a proposed standard

Re: [Gen-art] [tsvwg] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-09

Message- From: tsvwg [mailto:tsvwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks Sent: donderdag 21 augustus 2014 22:44 To: General Area Review Team; i...@ietf.org; ts...@ietf.org; draft-ietf- tsvwg-rsvp-pcn@tools.ietf.org Subject: [tsvwg] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-09 I am the

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-6man-why64-05

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 29-Sep-2014 IETF LC End Date: 30-Sep-2014 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-10

g-rsvp-pcn-10 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2-Oct-2014 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: 2-Oct-2014 Summary: Ready for publication as an Experimental RFC My nits from the earlier review (below) have been addressed. If you end up with pushback on simply using lowercase 'must'

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-07

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 14-Oct-2014 IETF LC End Date: 14-Oct-2014 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready with nits These are very small nits to consider. Please feel free to leave the existing text alone if these suggestions don't help. At the end of p

[Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-6man-why64-06

-why64-06 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 14-Oct-2014 IETF LC End Date: 30-Sep-2014 IESG Telechat date: 30-Oct-2014 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC On 9/29/14 3:04 AM, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-07

n, and spurious emission of retransmission control signals (such as NACK) in reliable delivery protocols (see Section 5.1)" work? Yes, and I've removed "emission of" from that proposed text. Ack Thanks, --David -Original Message- From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength

length-14 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 17-Oct-2014 IETF LC End Date: 27-Oct-2014 IESG Telechat date: not currently scheduled for any telechat Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC but with nits that should be considered before publication Nits/editorial comments: There

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-08

t-dscp-08 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 23-Oct-14 IETF LC End Date: (past) IESG Telechat date: 30-Oct-14 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] .all and non-wg-chair shepherds

No, they aren't typically at the moment, but they should be added soon (during next week if things go right). For those on genart that haven't found it already, you can check what the alias expands to at the moment for any given draft by looking at (and a

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15

e-wson-routing-wavelength-15 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 21-Nov-2014 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: 25-Nov-2014 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC Nits/editorial comments: This revision addresses my comments from IETF-LC on revision 14 (copied below). Thanks

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-16

eme-16 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 21-Nov-2014 IETF LC End Date: 25-Nov-2014 IESG Telechat date: 4-Dec-2014 Summary: Almost ready, but has nits that should be addressed before publication as a Proposed Standard Nits/editorial comments: First: (For Barry as sponsoring AD and shepherd): I

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-13

-conex-abstract-mech-13 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 1 Dec 2014 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 4 Dec 2014 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC This revision addresses my question below. RjS On 8/5/14 2:58 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART review

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17

d-ipps-uri-scheme-17 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2-Dec-2014 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 4-Dec-2014 Summary: Almost ready, but with nits that need to be addressed Jari/IESG: Please see my question about updating documents that are in other organization's change co

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-17

On 12/2/14 11:00 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: Hi, Robert, and thanks so much for the re-review. First: (For Barry as sponsoring AD and shepherd): I think you might want to say more about how this and the related PWG documents are being handled cross-organization. An RFC that normatively updates a

[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01

g with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 11 Dec 2014 IETF LC End Date: 29 Dec 2014 IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: While 308 should move to Proposed Standard, this

[Gen-art] Using status-change documents to republish RFCs is IMHO a bad idea (was Re: Gen-Art LC review: status-change-http-status-code-308-ps-01)

publishing an experimental document as PS without changing any of the words in the document is probably a warning sign that the conditions that warranted publishing the document as experimental in the first place were insufficiently captured. RjS On 12/11/14 9:37 AM, Robert

[Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-art LC review: draft-holmerg-dispatch-iotl-03.txt

Bah - failed to copy genart. RjS Forwarded Message Subject:Gen-art LC review: draft-holmerg-dispatch-iotl-03.txt Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:09:23 -0600 From: Robert Sparks To: draft-holmberg-dispatch-i...@tools.ietf.org, dispa...@ietf.org, i...@ietf.org I

Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-art LC review: draft-holmerg-dispatch-iotl-03.txt

On 12/19/14 3:10 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: Hi Robert, snipping to just a couple of the nit things: Nits/editorial comments: Since you are providing an extension point for other values, someone will ask if you need a registry for those values. I suggest explicitly saying we are not creat

Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-art LC review: draft-holmerg-dispatch-iotl-03.txt

ith the suggested changes? I suggest that we don't change the 3GPP scope. It would delay the draft, and nobody has shown any interest for non-3GPP usage. Regards, Christer -Original Message- From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg Sent: 19. jou

Re: [Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-art LC review: draft-holmerg-dispatch-iotl-03.txt

the 3GPP scope. It would delay the draft, and nobody has shown any interest for non-3GPP usage. Regards, Christer -Original Message- From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg Sent: 19. joulukuuta 2014 16:10 To: Robert Sparks; General Area Review Team

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autconfig-11

fig-11 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 16-Jan-2015 IETF LC End Date: 20-Jan-2015 IESG Telechat date: 5-Feb-2015 Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-13

before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-13 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 30Jan2015 IETF LC End Date: 20Jan2015 IESG Telechat date: 5Feb2015 Summary: (Still) ready for publication as Proposed Standard Thanks for adding me to the acknowledgements (though I

[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-08

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2 Feb 2015 IETF LC End Date: 10 Feb 2015 IESG Telechat date: 19 Feb 2015 Summary: Basically Ready for publication as BCP, but with nits that should be considered before publication. This is a well structured and fairly easy to follow document. The intended statu

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-08

On 2/2/15 1:27 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: Hi Robert, thanks for the review. Comments inline. On 2/2/15 12:03 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/tr

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-08

On 2/2/15 1:55 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: On 2/2/15 12:45 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: On 2/2/15 1:27 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: Hi Robert, thanks for the review. Comments inline. On 2/2/15 12:03 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this dr

[Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-uta-tls-bcp-09

ls-bcp-09 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 12 Feb 2015 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 19 Feb 2015 Summary: Ready for publication as BCP All of the points from my LC review of -08 have been well addressed. Thanks again for producing such an exceptionally clear do

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 03-03-2015 IETF LC End Date: 03-03-2015 IESG Telechat date: 03-05-2015 Summary: Ready modulo one nit This draft reads easily (describing the actual work converting between calendars is hard, but this draft doesn't have to talk about that). The body of the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04

On 3/3/15 11:21 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote: Hi Robert, Thanks for your review. --On March 3, 2015 at 11:02:39 AM -0600 Robert Sparks wrote: Summary: Ready modulo one nit This draft reads easily (describing the actual work converting between calendars is hard, but this draft doesn't ha

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-httpbis-auth-info-04

nfo-04 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 17Mar2015 IETF LC End Date: 02Apr2015 IESG Telechat date: 09Apr2015 Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2Apr2015 IETF LC End Date: 24Apr2015 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Ready for publication as Informational, with nits that should be considered. Nits/editorial comments: Nit: It raises flags for me when an Informational document uses "Updates"

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

bis-15 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 21Apr2015 IETF LC End Date: 28Apr2015 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard with one minor nit This is a very easy to read document for such a detail-rich protocol. Nit: The introduction calls out email addres

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

On 4/22/15 5:50 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Robert, On 21/04/2015 21:21, Robert Sparks wrote: Nit: The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with LDAP distinguished names). But in the body

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06

ouping-taxonomy-06 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 14 May 2015 IETF LC End Date: 18 May 2015 IESG Telechat date: Not currently scheduled Summary: This draft is on the right track, but has open issues. This draft has clearly helped progress conversations across several working groups, particularly

Re: [Gen-art] [avtext] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-06

r the document. Thanks! Ben. On 18 May 2015, at 4:38, Magnus Westerlund wrote: Robert Sparks skrev den 2015-05-14 21:21: Major issues: I'm surprised that there is no mention of how SRTP fits into the vocabulary this document builds. Would it be a mistake for someone to think of SRTP as

Re: [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-05-21

On 5/22/15 8:32 AM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Hi Dan, 2015-06-03 is the correct deadline. I'm wondering about the time machines, though. The last call date for draft-ietf-rtcweb-video is now a week after the telechat, and the draft is still on the telechat. It looks like the original last call

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-06

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 04Jun15 IETF LC End Date: 11Jun15 IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled Summary: On the right track, but has issues that should be discussed This draft reads easily, but there are a few things that might need more attention. It could be that these have been bea

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-sipcore-6665-clarification-00

I'm not an author, but I am closely involved with the document and the base spec so will jump in here anyhow in interest of timing. On 6/24/15 4:13 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: Thanks for your review, Tom. Authors, is there an answer to Tom’s question? jari On 17 Jun 2015, at 22:15, Tom Taylor wro

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-06

ats-06 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 24-Jun-2015 IETF LC End Date: 2-Jul-2015 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready with nits From looking at the document history and list archives, this document's been around for some time, and has had some editorial p

[Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-07

xt-rtp-grouping-taxonomy-07 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 6 Jul 2015 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 9 Jul 2015 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC Thanks for addressing the comments I made at LC. Very small nit: I still worry that with "at least some con

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05

ity-05 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 8 Jul 2015 IETF LC End Date: 29 Jul 2015 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled Summary: This draft has open issues to address before publication This draft adds two separable concepts to netconf * Asking for and receiving knowledge of when a command was ex

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05

responses to your comments can be found below. Please let us know if you have further comments or questions. Thanks, Tal and Yoram. -Original Message- From: ietf [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 12:40 AM To: General Area Review Team

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05

On 8/4/15 11:19 AM, Tal Mizrahi wrote: Hi Robert, Thanks for the comments. A typical example of using near-future scheduling is a coordinated commit; a client needs to trigger a commit at n servers, so that the n servers perform the commit as close as possible to simultaneously. Without the

[Gen-art] Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256

viewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 04-Aug-2015 IETF LC End Date: 25-Aug-2015 IESG Telechat date: not yet on any telechat Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard The change to PS addresses the concern I expressed in the review below. miniscule-nit: I still think the extra URI section aft

[Gen-art] Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256

mments you may receive. Document: draft-hansen-scram-sha256 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 04-Aug-2015 IETF LC End Date: 25-Aug-2015 IESG Telechat date: not yet on any telechat Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard The change to PS addresses the concern I expressed in the

[Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 17 Aug 2015 IETF LC End Date: 2 Jul 2015 IESG Telechat date: 20 Aug 2015 Summary: Ready with nits (but these nits may be discuss

Re: [Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07

nal document, there is no requirement that it carries the weight of an IETF recommendation. But of course, where it is clear that there is an IETF opinion, it might still say that explicitly. Jari On 17 Aug 2015, at 20:48, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The

Re: [Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07

On 8/20/15 9:34 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: After some more staring of the data tracker settings, you are of course completely correct, Robert :-) The document is marked as having IETF consensus setting, so the text that you quoted will get inserted into the RFC. Pardon my mistake in assuming it w

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-conex-destopt-09

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-conex-destopt-09 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 26 Aug 2015 IETF LC End Date: 31 Aug 2015 IESG Telechat date: 1 Oct 2015 Summary: On the right track with open issues Major issues: M1) This document claims to specify &quo

[Gen-art] Gen-Art telechat review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256-04 (was Re: Gen-art (second) LC review: draft-hansen-scram-sha256)

For completeness in the gen-art archives and so that Jari doesn't have to go looking: (boilerplate elided) Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard On 8/4/15 1:43 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: (apologies to the genart list who will see this as a duplicate): I am the assigned Ge

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sparks-genarea-review-tracker-03.txt

Thanks Suresh! On 9/1/15 10:17 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a ne

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-04

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-04 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2 Sep 2015 IETF LC End Date: 9 Sep 2015 IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard One thing I&

[Gen-art] Genart Telechat review: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-07

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pcp-anycast-07 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 14 Sep 2015 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 17 Sep 2015 Summary: On the right track, but has issues that should be discussed I can&

[Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-08

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-08 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 14 Sep 2015 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 17 Sep 2015 Summary: Ready for publication as an Experimental RFC The changes

[Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label-05

, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-lambda-label Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 14 Sep 2015 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 17 Sep 2015 Summary: (still) Ready for publication as Proposed Standard

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-08

ahi *Subject:* Fw: Gen-art Telechat review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-08 - Forwarded Message - *From:*Robert Sparks mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com>> *To:* General Area Review Team <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>>; "i...@ietf.org <mailto:i...@ietf.org>" mail

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-conex-destopt-09

ion on ConEx. Does this makes sense to you? Yes. Mirja On 26.08.2015 22:19, Robert Sparks wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just

Re: [Gen-art] [conex] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-conex-destopt-09

On 10/1/15 12:27 PM, Bob Briscoe wrote: Robert, Mirja, Responding (eventually) as one of the authors of conex-abstract-mech First one point I picked up that might be a misconception from Robert: On 26.08.2015 22:19, Robert Sparks wrote: Should there be a statement that this option must not

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 16 Oct 2015 IETF LC End Date: 19 Oct 2015 IESG Telechat date: 22 Oct 2015 Summary: Almost ready for publication as PS but with issues that need to be discussed/add

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02

On 10/19/15 9:34 PM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: Hi Robert, Thanks a lot for your review and comments. Please see my replies inline: -Original Message- From: ietf [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 5:31 AM To: General Area Review

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02

On 10/22/15 5:15 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: But in this case I noticed that http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe/ shows 1 IPR whereas https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02 does not. But https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-pwe3-redundancy-spe-

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-02

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-isis-route-preference Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 27Oct2015 IETF LC End Date: 30Oct2015 IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard This document reads easily despite most

[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-05

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-05 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 13Nov2015 IETF LC End Date: 23Nov2015 IESG Telechat date: not yet scheduled Summary: Ready for publication as BCP This document is shorter than it seems on first

[Gen-art] Genart LC review draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-10

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay-10 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 25Nov2015 IETF LC End Date: 4Dec2015 IESG Telechat date: (not yet scheduled) Summary: Ready for publication as Proposed Standard with nits This is a small nit, but

[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-06

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-06 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 4Dec2015 IETF LC End Date: 9Dec2015 IESG Telechat date: 17Dec2015 Summary: Almost ready for publication as Proposed Standard, but with a minor issue that sho

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-06

Cutting away a bit to focus on the question: On 12/12/15 8:32 PM, Mike Jones wrote: Hi Robert. Thanks for the useful review. Replies are inline below... -Original Message- I would have been much more comfortable with a consensus to require 'crit'. (Count me in the rough if this

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-06

In contrast, using an implementation that understands "b64" achieves both (a) and (b) without needing to include "crit". That's why it's not required. Does that make sense now? Best wishes, -- Mi

  1   2   3   4   >