Re: [Gen-art] Assignment: draft-vandesompel-info-uri-04.txt

issue. Yours, Joel M. Halpern APP The "info" URI Scheme for Information Assets with Identifiers in Public Namespaces (Informational) - 2 of 2 <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vandesompel-info-uri-04.txt>draft-vandesompel-info-uri-04.txt Note: Handling m

[Gen-art] LC Review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc2858bis-07.txt

not come up with a better way to meet this reasonable goal, I am not objecting to the text. Yours, Joel M. Halpern PS: I am not copying the AD, Shepherd, Chairs, and WG as the review does not say anything useful. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-ar

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Lunch in Vancouver?

I have a lunch meeting Tuesday (I think Avri may be at the same meeting.) It is looking like I will have a Wednesday lunch, so Thursday is my preference. (If that lunch firms up, I'll let you know. If we pick a day, I will let that lunch know of the conflict.) Yours, Joel At 07:22 AM 11/3/20

Re: [Gen-art] Assignments for Dec 1st, 2005

This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. (I checked the differences from the previous version. There is a nice elaboration on a security issue that had not even bothered me the first time. Nothing else appeared to be substantive.) Yours, Joel M. Halpern

Re: [Gen-art] Assignment: draft-krovetz-umac-07.txt

This individual contribution for informational RFC appears to be ready for publication. The text in section 5 raised a question. If this is intended to be read by folks who are not security experts, an explanation of what the algorithm is to be used for in lay terms would be helpful. The tex

Re: [Gen-art] Assignment: drat-ietf-ieprep-domain-frame-05.txt

This document is is nearly ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Over all, this is quite readable and covers a lot of ground. Moderate: Describing MPLS as a routing protocol seems wrong in at least two regards: 1) MPLS control can be described as a path placement protocol. But is not

Re: [Gen-art] Sheep not obeying shepherds

I think we want to be careful of tightening this too far. If the author has to make a revision, and the authors thinks that a suggestion from the gen-art team improves the text, then I would hate for the author to feel that they could not make the change. (This is for situations where a revisi

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-04.txt

iately-04.txt Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 16-August-2013 IETF LC End Date: 12-September-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comment

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mmusic-duplication-grouping-03

ouping-03 Duplication Grouping Semantics in the Session Description Protocol Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 13-September-2013 IETF LC End Date: 24-September-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: N/A Minor iss

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14

nes-14 Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 20-October-2013 IETF LC End Date: 03-Oct-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a BCP. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: N/A ___ Gen-art m

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology-09.txt

ogy-09.txt LDP Extensions for Multi Topology Routing Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 18-October-2013 IETF LC End Date: 6-November-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. I believe there is one major issue that is

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12

qoe-12 RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for MOS Metric Reporting Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 12-November-2013 IETF LC End Date: 27-November-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed St

Re: [Gen-art] [xrblock] Review: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12

comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-12 RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for MOS Metric Reporting Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 12-November-2013 IETF LC End Date: 27-November

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-02

ags-02 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) on Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 24-November-2013 IETF LC End Date: 02-December-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard

[Gen-art] review; draft-ietf-stox-presence-06

nce-06 Interworking between the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Presence draft-ietf-stox-presence-06 Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 28-November-2013 IETF LC End Date: 11-December-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A S

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-03

neg-03 Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application Layer Protocol Negotiation Extension Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 20-December-2013 IETF LC End Date: 27-December-2013 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issue

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-rmpr-optimization-00

2-rmpr-optimization-00 Routing MPR Optimization for the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 21-January-2014 IETF LC End Date: 4-February-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed St

Re: [Gen-art] [cuss] review: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-10

know if there are any other issues. - Alan - On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Joel M. Halpern mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>> wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/__area/gen/

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13

This revision address all of my comments and is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Yours, Joel On 1/30/14, 8:46 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Joel Halpern2013-11-27 draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-qoe-13* ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-ar

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-stox-presence-07

This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Yours, Joel On 1/30/14, 8:46 PM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Joel Halpern2013-12-11 draft-ietf-stox-presence-07* ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-04

This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Yours, Joel On 1/31/14, 11:34 AM, A. Jean Mahoney wrote: Joel Halpern draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-04* ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/lis

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-forwarding-06

viewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 31-January-2014 IETF LC End Date: 12-Feb-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: N/A ___ G

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-forwarding-08

This document is still ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Yours, Joel On 1/31/14, 2:47 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04

680-04 Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 13-February-2014 IETF LC End Date: 27-February-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: N/A Minor issue

[Gen-art] review: draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-04

offman-xml2rfc-04 The 'XML2RFC' version 3 Vocabulary Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Summary: This review focuses on readability rather than on XML details. In that light, this document could use some improvement. Major issues: The explanation in section 1.1 seems to bounce fro

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05

-group-05 Extended Administrative Groups in MPLS-TE Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 24-April-2014 IETF LC End Date: 06-May-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standards RFC Major issues: N/A Minor issues: I believe that the descr

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] review: draft-ietf-mpls-extended-admin-group-05

he Administrative Groups when a node wishes to advertise more than 32 colors for a link." If I rephrased it as " The EAG sub-TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups when an operator wants to make more than 32 colors available for advertisement on a link" would that do it?

[Gen-art] Review: draft-adolf-dvb-urn-upd-00

ate to the Registrant Information for the Digital Video Broadcasting Project (DVB) Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 22-May-2014 IETF LC End Date: 16-June-2014 IESG Telechat date: 26-June-2014 Summary: This document is ready for publication

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-01

zation-01 Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 12-June-2014 IETF LC End Date: 23-June-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comment

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-sidr-cps-04.txt

04.txt Template for a Certification Practice Statement (CPS) for the Resource PKI (RPKI) Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 20-June-2014 IETF LC End Date: 03-July-2014 IESG Telechat date: 10-July-2014 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a BCP RFC. Major

[Gen-art] review: draft-masotta-tftpexts-windowsize-opt-10.txt

ze-opt-10.txt TFTP Windowsize Option Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date:10-July-2014 IETF LC End Date: 4-Aug-2014 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial co

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02

This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Yours, Joel M. Halpern On 6/12/14, 8:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArt

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06

tch-06 JSON Merge Patch Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 1-Aug-2014 IETF LC End Date: 8-Aug-2014 IESG Telechat date: 21-Aug-2014 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: Minor issues: I will check separately with the authors about one con

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch-06

Ignore my minor comment. I re-read the pseudo-code and realized what was going on. No problem at all. It is indeed ready to publish. Yours, Joel On 8/1/14, 12:28 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02

(I thought I already sent this.) -02 is also ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Yours, Joel On 6/12/14, 8:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/w

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02

-03 is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Yours, Joel On 8/11/14, 5:57 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: (I thought I already sent this.) -02 is also ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Yours, Joel On 6/12/14, 8:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-masotta-tftpexts-windowsize-opt-11.txt

-11 is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Yours, Joel On 7/10/14, 7:25 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please r

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10

JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 18-Sept-2014 IETF LC End Date: 29-Sept-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document appears to be ready for publicaiton as a Pr

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04

-reply-04 Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 8-October-2014 IETF LC End Date: 13-October-2014 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This document is not ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: There is either a major technica

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-weirds-using-http-13

ttp-13 HTTP usage in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 18-October-2014 IETF LC End Date: 24-October-2014 IESG Telechat date: 30-October-2014 Summary: This document is (still, to the degree this reviewer can tell) ready for publication as a Proposed St

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04

: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:20:17 -0400 From: "Joel M. Halpern" To: "A. Jean Mahoney" , gen-art@ietf.org, "m...@ietf.org" , Adrian Farrel , IETF discussion list Subject: [mpls] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04 Message-ID: <

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04

In line. On 10/21/14, 10:36 AM, lizho@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Joel, see inline below, thanks. > > Lizhong > > >> 2014.10.21，PM9:30，Joel M. Halpern wrote ： >> >> If the process for this draft is to use the top address that can be >> reached in the rou

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04

still a mistaken routability problem, but I can not illustrate the failure without some other case being described. Yours, Joel On 10/21/14, 10:06 PM, Lizhong Jin wrote: > Inline, thanks. > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com] &g

Re: [Gen-art] [mpls] review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-04

ddress is not private address. As I know, most deployed inter-AS > or inter-area MPLS LSP is in the network without private IP address. > > Regards > Lizhong > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com] >> Sent: 2014

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-bmwg-bgp-basic-convergence-04.txt

rgence-04.txt Basic BGP Convergence Benchmarking Methodology for Data Plane Convergence Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 30-October-2014 IETF LC End Date: 10-November-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is almost ready for publication

[Gen-art] Review draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing-06.txt

ing-06.txt DNSSEC Key Rollover Timing Considerations Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 28-November-2014 IETF LC End Date: 8-December-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready to be published as an Informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: It is unclear to this

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-roll-admin-local-policy-02

icy-02 MPL forwarder policy for multicast with admin-local scope Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 15-December-2014 IETF LC End Date: 24-December-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is not ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: There seems t

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs-03

e-reqs-03 Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement and Requirements Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 2-January-2014 IETF LC End Date: 14-January-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informa

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-kitten-gss-loop-04

oop-04 Structure of the GSS Negotiation Loop Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 28-January-2015 IETF LC End Date: 9-February-2015 IESG Telechat date: n/a Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: Secti

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt

ric-11.txt Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 5-Feb-2015 IETF LC End Date: 18-Feb-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Best Current Practice. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial co

[Gen-art] Review: draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt

05.txt SMTP 521 and 556 Reply Codes Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 12-March-2015 IETF LC End Date: 2-April-2015 IESG Telechat date: 9-April-2015 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Major issues: Minor issues: The description of the 556 reply c

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-klensin-smtp-521code-05.txt

That wording works for me. Yours, Joel On 3/17/15 10:21 AM, John C Klensin wrote: --On Monday, March 16, 2015 23:06 -0400 Barry Leiba wrote: Joel, thanks for the review. Minor issues: The description of the 556 reply code in section 4 seems to switch between refering to the gene

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-scim-use-cases-05

ses-05 System for Cross-domain Identity Management (SCIM) Definitions, Overview, and Flows Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 30-March-2015 IETF LC End Date: 7-N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial co

[Gen-art] Review: draft-hallambaker-tlsfeature-09

X.509v3 TLS Feature Extension Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 9-April-2014 IETF LC End Date: 5-May-2014 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC (at least to the degree that this non-expert in security can tell.) Major issue

[Gen-art] Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth-22.txt

22.txt A set of SASL Mechanisms for OAuth Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 30-April-2015 IETF LC End Date: 14-May-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comment

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

int-05 JSON Web Key (JWK) Thumbprint Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 19-June-2015 IETF LC End Date: N/A IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: The internet draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. [Note to readers: This review is provided because the spreadsheet said so. The

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08

Port Control Protocol (PCP) Proxy Function Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 19-June-2015 IETF LC End Date: 29-June-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial co

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-xmpp-posh-04

X over Secure HTTP (POSH) Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date:25-June-2015 IETF LC End Date: 08-July-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This internet-draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comment

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

ou may receive. Document: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05 JSON Web Key (JWK) Thumbprint Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 19-June-2015 IETF LC End Date: N/A IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: The internet draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. [Note to readers: This review is

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00 The .

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-03 Reviewer:

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-04

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-04 Building Power-Efficient CoAP Devices for Cellular Networks Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 13-Auguest-2015 IETF LC End Date: 24-August-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is rea

[Gen-art] review: draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00 Statement of Work for Extensions to the IETF Datatracker for Author Statistics Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 27-August-2015 IETF LC End Date: 23-September-201

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10 Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 17-September-2015 IETF LC End Date: 25-Sept-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publi

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-housley-sow-author-statistics-00

the new XML schema to make the author's continent of residence available, even if it not used in the formatting of the human-readable document. On Aug 27, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Ge

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10

-- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 21:35:34 -0400 From: "Joel M. Halpern" mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>> To: "A. Jean Mahoney" mailto:maho...@nostrum.com>>, General Area Review

[Gen-art] Review: draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa-05.txt

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa-05.txt Cloning IKE SA in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 2-Oct-2015 IETF LC End Date: 27-Oct-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This docum

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa-05.txt

27; in which case the VPN has reached its final destination. NEW TEXT -- END -Original Message----- From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com] Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 1:25 PM To: A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa@ietf.org Subject

[Gen-art] [Gen-Art] Review: draft-ietf-ace-usecases-07

see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ace-usecases-07 ACE use cases Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 15-Oct-2015 IETF LC End Date: 22-Oct-2015 IESG Telechat date: 22-Oct-2015 Summary: This document is ready to be published

[Gen-art] Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence Standard Representation of Domain-Sequence Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 29-October-2015 IETF LC End Date: 09-November-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is almost rea

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence

Thank you. This addresses my concern. Yours, Joel On 11/2/15 11:14 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: Hi Julien, All, So now we have - (and thanks for bearing with me, as we get there...) IGP Area subobjects in the XRO are local to the current AS. In case of multi-AS path computation to exclude

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04 An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 24-November-2015 IETF LC End Date: 4- December-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs-05

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs-05 Updated TLS Server Identity Check Procedure for Email Related Protocols Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 24-November-2015 IETF LC End Date: 4-December-2015 IESG Telechat date: 17-December-2015 S

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06 Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Rendezvous Extension Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 16-Dec-2015 IETF LC End Date: 28-Dec-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publicatio

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10 Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: IETF LC End Date: 27-January-2016 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Pr

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10

6:41 PM, Ralph Giles wrote: On 15/01/16 02:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: Minor issues: While I do not completely understand ogg lacing values, there appears to be an internal inconsistency in the text in section 3: 1) "if the previous page with packet data does not end in a continued p

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10

That would work very well. Thanks Tim. Yours, Joel On 1/15/16 6:52 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: Joel M. Halpern wrote: On the minor note, I had not realized those were already relevant parameters. Anyone using this can reasonably be expected to know that, so it is not a big deal. Given

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-codec-oggopus-10

. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 15, 2016, at 4:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com>> wrote: At the very least, the last call needed to identify the downref to RFC 3533. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/m

[Gen-art] Review: draft-martin-urn-globus-02

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-martin-urn-globus-02 A URN Namespace for Globus Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 11-Feb-2016 IETF LC End Date: 9-March-2016 IESG Telechat date: 17-March-2016 Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04 IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 10-March-2016 IETF LC End Date: 21-March-2016 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Pr

Re: [Gen-art] [urn] Review: draft-martin-urn-globus-02

requirements. My view is that we should not be too rigorous about this point at this stage. Barry On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: Thanks, Joel. Authors, any responses to this? I think we need to discuss this… Jari On 12 Feb 2016, at 00:26, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-04

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-04 Multicast VPN state damping Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 28-March-2016 IETF LC End Date: 13-April-2016 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a pr

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04

Fundamentally, no, it is NOT normalized. It is the reviewers judgment of the importance. I try to use a measure that says that if I were an AD, I would think this was blocking before I mark things as Major. But that is just me. And is still a judgment call. And, in case it got lost in the

[Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00 Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 22-April-2016 IETF LC End Date: 13-May-2016 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary:

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00

Interesting. I was looking at bullet 4 in section 3, which reads "At least two [implementations] must be written independently." Not a big deal. And yes, I think a sentence or two on other value in implementation reports would be helpful. My thought is that there are many cases where the BC

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-sheffer-rfc6982bis-00

existing RFC that documents an implementation, so we can refer to it in the text. Best, Yaron On 04/22/2016 09:05 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: Interesting. I was looking at bullet 4 in section 3, which reads "At least two [implementations] must be written independently." Not a big deal.

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-bess-multicast-damping-04

) in version -06, uploaded one minute ago. Best, -Thomas On 28 Mar 2016, at 08:08, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-08

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-08 Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Customizing DHCP Configuration on the Basis of Network Topology Review Date: 13-May-2016 IETF LC End Date: 23-May-2016 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is rea

[Gen-art] Review: draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-12

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-12 The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 16-June-2016 IETF LC End Date: 2016-07-08 IESG Te

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt Parallel NFS (pNFS) SCSI Layout Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 5-July-2016 IETF LC End Date: 12-July-2016 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Pr

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-10

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-10 Multiplexing Scheme Updates for Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Extension for Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 28-July-2016 IETF

[Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-07

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-07 Generation of IPv6 Atomic Fragments Considered Harmful Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 11-August-2016 IETF LC End Date: 22-August-2016 IESG Telechat date: 1-Sept-2016 Summary

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02 Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespaces for Broadband Forum Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 14-October-2016 IETF LC End Date: 4-November-2016 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is almost rea

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

Thanks Barbarra. With regard to the assignment process text, what you have would work. I would suggest dropping the text about membership and simply talking about going through the BBF document creation and approval process. Yours, Joel On 10/27/16 12:53 PM, STARK, BARBARA H wrote: Hi Joel

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09

ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09 Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 30-October-2016 IETF LC End Date: 10-November-2016 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This document is rea

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

I see your point about this adding a value to the entry created by RFC 4458. Is there a reason this can not simply be PS? The fact that 4458 is Informational does not, as far as I can tell, justify continuing the error. While this is for a 3GPP usage, it appears to have been reviewed by the D

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

one. But it is up to you folks. In teh end, all I can do is raise the question, not decide it :-) Yours, Joel On 12/15/16 11:51 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: On Dec 15, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I see your point about this adding a value to the entry created by RFC 4458. Is

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-07

Yes, those fixes ddress my concerns. Thank you. Joel On 1/3/17 3:36 AM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) wrote: Hi Joel, Thanks for your response. Please see inline -Original Message- From: Joel Halpern Date: Saturday, 24 December 2016 at 4:45 AM To: "gen-art@ietf.org" Cc: "bfcp...@ietf.org" ,

Re: [Gen-art] [Pce] Review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18

So it is intentional that this draft prohibits that behavior (PCE driven establishment)? Yours, Joel On 2/16/17 11:35 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: Hi Joel, Regarding your comment - Is the intention to prohibit the driving of LSP creation from the PCE? This capability is described in - https://t

  1   2   3   4   5   >