Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-08

2019-07-01 Thread Jen Linkova
solutions. > > Is that second sentence right? If you are giving a general class of solutions, > that seems agnostic to the particular solution. Just a bit confusing. Updated. > >A host SHOULD be able respond dynamically... > > Do you mean "is expected to" instead of "SHOULD"? "SHOULD" seems overdone. Fixed, thanks! -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-08

2019-07-03 Thread Jen Linkova
nterprise-pa-multihoming-11#section-8.3 > >> My suspicion is that section 7.3 underestimates the availability > >> (current and > >> future) of multipath transport. > You can have the half empty glass; I'll take the half full one. ;-) As per Magnus's suggestion, I've updated the text to mention that PA-based multihoming and MP transport could benefit from each other: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-11#section-8.3 -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [v6ops] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-cache-init-04

2020-09-06 Thread Jen Linkova
revious revision of the document, but looks like it was not ;( > = >o Data packets to the router LLA > SB> LLA? Not in the editors list and not defined as far as I can see, Fixed. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04

2021-06-21 Thread Jen Linkova
ll normative text could be found in section 6. Do you think we need another paragraph in Introduction (or another section, 1.3?) explaining the document structure? Or do I misunderstand your suggestion? -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry ___ Gen-art mailing list Ge

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04

2021-06-21 Thread Jen Linkova
RFC4861] are specified in Section 6. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-07

2024-04-02 Thread Jen Linkova
let items, 2nd sentence: delete “the” > before > “network resources”. > > Page 16, 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence: insert “the” before “amount of”. > > Page 16, 2nd paragraph, 3rd sentence: append a comma after “perform ND > proxy”. > > Page 16, 2nd paragraph, 4th sentence: delete “a” before “single”. > > Page 16, 2nd paragraph, last sentence: append a comma after “case”. Change > “implict” to “implicit”. > > Page 20, acknowledgements: append a comma after “input”. Change > “contribution” > to “contributions”. > > > > -- Cheers, Jen Linkova ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-11

2024-05-21 Thread Jen Linkova
None. > > Minor issues: None. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Two very brief spelling/grammar replacements: > > s/re-start/restart > s/IA-Address/IA Address > > > -- Cheers, Jen Linkova ___ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org

[Gen-art] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-09

2024-09-30 Thread Jen Linkova
ased it to: "When a prefix's Preferred Lifetime becomes zero, either because the Preferred Lifetime expires or because the host receives a PIO for the prefix with a zero Preferred Lifetime, the prefix MUST be removed from the list." Is it better? -- Cheers, Jen Linkova ___ Gen-art mailing list -- gen-art@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to gen-art-le...@ietf.org