Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib-03.txt

Dan: Thank you very much your review. And Prakash, thank you for addressing Dan's concerns. I'm happy to recommend the document for approval in our next telechat. Jari On Apr 3, 2013, at 3:20 PM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote: > Hi Prakash, > > Thanks for this further clarification. > > Fro

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-alto-server-discovery-08

Meral: Thank you very much your review. I did not see a response to your review, but maybe it was sent privately. In any case, the suggested edits seem to be included in the new version so, with your review and my quick review, I'll be happy to recommend the approval of the draft. Jari On Jun

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-05

Peter: Thank you very much for your review. Based on this review and my own review, I am recommending the approval of this draft in today's telechat. (Note that other ADs have raised a number of other issues, some of which I agree with, but I did not want to repeat their comments.) Jari On J

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-storm-ipsec-ips-update-03.txt

Thank you Francis for your review and David for you attention to the comments. I have placed a No-Objection ballot for the draft. Jari On Aug 28, 2013, at 5:51 PM, "Black, David" wrote: > Thank you - the -04 will appear after the results of the IETF telechat > on Thursday, probably sometime ne

Re: [Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-opt-11.txt

Christer: thank you for your review! Jari On Aug 23, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for directio

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avtcore-idms-09

Thank you Dan very, very much for your detailed review. And thank you Ray and others for addressing the points noted by Dan - I think the document has improved as a result. Thanks again. I have balloted no-objection for this document in today's IESG telechat. Jari On Jun 11, 2013, at 1:29 PM,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-10.txt

Brian: Thank you for your review. (I am working on my own review of the document - this is one of the ones that I will read very carefully on my own as well.) Jari On Aug 23, 2013, at 2:38 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >

Re: [Gen-art] [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04

Thank you for your review! It was certainly different from most Gen-ART reviews, but has generated interesting discussion. I believe other ADs at the IESG have raised the issue whether this should be the standard way to do things, or just a way. Lets see where the discussion ends. Jari On Jul

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-03

Thank you Alexey for your comments! jari On Aug 30, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > > Thanks Alexey, > > We'll take care of these comments asap. > > - Jouni > > > On Aug 30, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Alexey Melnikov > wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3316bis-04

Thanks for your review, Alexey! Jari On Sep 10, 2013, at 7:10 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > > Thanks Alexey. > > - Jouni > > On Sep 10, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Alexey Melnikov > wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> <

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-repute-media-type-12

Thanks for your review, Peter. I have balloted a No-Objection for this draft. Jari On Sep 8, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Peter Yee wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-repute-model-08

Thanks for your review, Roni. The Gen-ART reviews by you and the rest of the team are essential for me to do my work. And thank you authors for writing a clear and useful document. I must say that like Roni, I had some trouble with the document classification. It did read more as an information

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-repute-query-http-10

Meral: Thank you for your review! Jari On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> . > > Please wait for direction f

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-04.txt

Joel: Thank you for review! Jari On Sep 6, 2013, at 8:13 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along wi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-mediactrl-call-flows-13.txt

Brian: Thank you for your review, and thank you Lorenzo for taking these comments into account. I have balloted No-Objection for this document. jari On Sep 9, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Lorenzo Miniero wrote: > Brian, > > thanks for the review! We'll add those elements to the terminology > section. >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ivov-xmpp-cusax-07.txt

Brian: Thank you again for your review. Peter: Thank you for addressing the comments. I have balloted a no-objection position. Jari On Sep 8, 2013, at 4:51 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > h

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-targeted-mldp-03.txt

Francis: Thank you very much for your review. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-08.txt

Thanks for your review again, Brian! And thank you authors for updating the document! I have placed a no-objection ballot for this document. Jari On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-14

Thank you very much for the review, Russ. And thank you Adrian for the clarification. Russ, are you happy with this explanation? Jari On Aug 24, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Thanks Russ! > >> Minor Concerns: >> >> In section 3, there is a discussion that includes ODU0, ODU2e, and

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-14

I'm reading the document now myself . >>> In section 3, there is a discussion that includes ODU0, ODU2e, and ODU4, >>> but these terms are not defined in the paragraph or in the terminology >>> section. I realize that these are ODUj values, but ODUflex is an ODUj, >>> and it is included in the te

Re: [Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-pim-rfc4601-update-survey-report-02.txt

Thank you for review of this document, Christer. These reviews are important for me. Authors, have you seen Christer's review, and do you have a comment? Jari On Sep 11, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09

Thank you for review, Pete. Jari On Sep 12, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Hi Pete, > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Pete McCann wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/ar

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19

Meral: Thank you for your review! Jari On Sep 5, 2013, at 5:40 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> . > > Please wait for direction f

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

Roni, Thanks again for your review. Do you think all the issues that you originally listed are resolved? Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-12

Vijay: Thank you very much for your review and re-review, and thank you authors for the revisions. I have placed a No-Objection position on the document. Jari On Sep 20, 2013, at 8:18 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART,

Re: [Gen-art] [netext] Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07

Thank you Robert very much for your review. And I agree with the issue you raised. Thank you Suresh and others for the revision. But I do wish you'd submit the -09…. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-solmaxrt-update-05 (second review - for IESG telechat)

Thank you very much for your review, Dan. I have placed a No-Objection position for the document. Jari On Sep 22, 2013, at 6:29 PM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review ofdraft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update-03

Thank you for your review, Suresh. I have placed a no-objection position for this document in today's IESG telechat. Jari On Sep 18, 2013, at 6:52 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update-03 > > For background on Gen-ART, please see t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-07

Thank you for the reviews & document revisions! I have placed a no-objection ballot for this document. jari On Sep 20, 2013, at 6:35 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-boucadair-rfc6153-update-01

Thanks for your review, Joel. It is appreciated. Jari On Sep 6, 2013, at 7:33 PM, Joel Halpern wrote: > (Discovered I had not sent this to the list when I did it. Sorry.) > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-12

Indeed, thank you. Jari On Sep 20, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > > Thanks David. > > - JOuni > > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 2:57 AM, "Black, David" wrote: > >> And the -12 version is likewise ready for publication as an Informational >> RFC. >> >> Thanks, >> --David >> >>>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ivov-grouptextchat-purpose-03

Thanks for your review, Meral - appreciated! Jari On Jul 19, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq > . > > Please resolve an

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review ofdraft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

Thanks! On Sep 30, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Roni Even wrote: > Hi Jari, > Sorry for late response, I have been on vacation all last week and now > catching up. > My concern was with the IANA registry which looks OK in version 13 of the > draft > Roni > >> -Original

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows-06.txt

Thank you Brian very much for your review. I have balloted No-Obj… Jari On Oct 4, 2013, at 7:25 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ecrit-psap-callback-10

Vijay, thanks for the detailed review and Hannes thanks for the update! I have balloted a No-Obj position for this draft. Jari On Sep 29, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > thanks for the time to review the document so carefully. > > I have just submitted an updated

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14

Thanks for your review, Joel! Jari On Sep 20, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review for draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-04

All: Thanks for the review & update. I have balloted a no-objection for this draft. Jari On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:26 PM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-06

Ben: thank you very much for the review. Mary: thank you for addressing the comments. I have balloted a No-Obj for this draft. Jari On Oct 9, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Mary Barnes wrote: > Thanks Ben. We'll fix these nits in the next version. > > Mary. > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ben Cam

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-idr-rfd-usable-02

Vijay: Thanks for the review and for raising an issue - I am glad we discussed it, and with the explanation I too agree that the document can go ahead. I have balloted a No-Obj for this draft… Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-impl-survey-results-02.txt

Thank you for the review, Brian! And thank you Andy for the changes. I think the draft can move forward, do you Brian have further comments? Jari On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:31 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-worley-service-example-13.txt

Thanks for your review, Suresh. I have balloted a no-objection, but would also like to hear from the authors if they have seen Suresh's comments below. Have you? Jari On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-11

Thanks for your review, Dan! Jari On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:51 PM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from

Re: [Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-hip-reload-instance-09

Indeed, thank you! I have balloted a no-obj position for this document. Jari On Oct 4, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Ari Keränen wrote: > Thanks Christer! > > > Cheers, > Ari > > On 10/4/13 8:42 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-intarea-flow-label-balancing-02

All: Thanks much for the review & changes. Jari On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:50 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction f

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05

Thank you Ali and Ben! Jari On Oct 9, 2013, at 1:13 AM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) wrote: > > Ben, > > Thanks for your comments. I have incorporated all your comments in rev06 > of this draft. > > > On 9/23/13 1:29 PM, "Ben Campbell" wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draf

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-03

Thank you - both of you! Jari On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Olaf Kolkman wrote: > > On 16 okt. 2013, at 04:48, Peter Yee wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest-09

Pete, Thank you for the review! This document is now coming to the telechat (6 months later!) and I just wanted to let you know that while I did not see a response to your e-mail, the nits seem to have been taken into account. Jari On Mar 28, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Pete McCann wrote: > I am th

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03

Thank you very much for this detailed review. Authors, do you have comments? While much of the comments are editorial, like Meral I had trouble understanding what the "chooses not conform" on page 17 means. Did you mean "chooses not to use"? Similarly, on page 18, I did not understand this: "a

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-roll-terminology-13.txt

Thank you so much for the review, Francis! I plan to post a no-objection ballot position but first I'd like to ensure that the authors have seen these comments. Have you? Jari On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:57 PM, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For backgroun

Re: [Gen-art] Genart review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-11

Thanks for the review! On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Hi Daniele, > > Your suggested actions to address my issues look good. > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > Christer > > > From: Daniele Ceccarelli > Sent: Monday, 30 September 2013 5:01 PM > To: Christer Holmberg

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone-12

Roni: thank you very much for your review. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-ecc-07

Thanks for your review, Meral. Jari On Oct 10, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq > . > > Please resolve these comments a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified-04

Thanks for your review, Peter! Jari On Oct 24, 2013, at 12:08 PM, Peter Yee wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > > Document: draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-10

Thank you for the review and re-review; thank you Hannes for the updates. I have balloted no-obj. Jari On Nov 18, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-38.txt

Thank you for your extensive review and Magnus thank you for addressing the issues. Are you tracking the nits from below? I have balloted no-obj. Jari On Nov 19, 2013, at 6:57 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I have been selected as an additional General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for thi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3-09

Many thanks for your review, Robert! Daniele, thank you for the modifications. However, I do not see the IANA section modification yet in -11. But maybe I missed it. Has that been incorporated to the latest version? (I thought your text suggestion looked fine.) Jari On Oct 15, 2013, at 5:21 AM

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-11

Thank you for the review and updates! I have balloted no-obj for this document. Jari On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Thomson wrote: > > (some text skipped) >>> [Authors] We summarize what the document i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-ecrit-unauthenticated-access-07.txt

Thank you for the review and updates! Jari On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > Hi Alexey, > > thanks for the review. I have incorporated your comments in the updated > version. I will have to incorporate the comments from Richard as well before > I submit a new version.

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mmusic-duplication-grouping-03

Joel: thank you for your review. I have balloted a no-obj for this document. Jari On Sep 13, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-delayed-duplication-02.txt (resent)

Francis: Thank you for your review. I have balloted a no-obj position for this document. Jari On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote: > hi Francis > > Thanks for the review. The first nit, yes, i think I missed the one preferred > by the RFC editor (this will be fixed by th

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-27

Robert: thank you very much for your review. Randy: I have balloted a no-obj based on this review. Jari On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:16 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05.txt

Suresh: thank you very much for the review. Carlos: I assume you and Joel have the token on ensuring that changes, if any, get folded in before the document is shipped to the RFC editor. I have balloted a no-obj position for this draft. By the way, I agree with the points that Suresh raised. Ja

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10

Many thanks for this review, Wassim! I have balloted a no-obj position for this draft for today's IESG telechat. Marc: I assume you have the token on ensuring a resolution for the points is reached somehow. Jari On Nov 21, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08

Not sure this mail made it to the appropriate parties (Peter reported some e-mail issue with the list). However, many thanks for the review, Peter, appreciated! I do agree with the minor issue that Peter raises and the suggested text from Fernando. I don't see a new document revision yet, howev

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering-05.txt

Thanks! On Nov 21, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > Closing the loop on this Gen-ART review. > > Thanks again Suresh for reviewing. > > Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro. > Excuze typofraphicak errows > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Suresh Krishnan >> Date: No

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-resnick-on-consensus-06

Thanks for your review, Russ. Jari On Nov 14, 2013, at 8:56 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > > Please resolve these comments along with a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mile-sci-11

Thanks! On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > On 17/10/2013 14:40, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> >> . >> >> Please reso

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-15

Thanks for your review, Wassim! I will place a no-obj position on this document as soon as my Internet re-starts working in this hotel… Jari On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:22 AM, Wassim Haddad wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10

Ok. But I agree with Wassim that it needs breaking up. I'd just do s/but unfortunately/. Unfortunately/ Jari On Nov 21, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 11/21/2013 04:51 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: >&g

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-05.txt

Thank you Suresh for the review! And thank you Christian for the quick response & update. I have balloted a no-obj position for this draft on today's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi Christian/Med, > I checked out the -06 version submitted this m

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06

All - thank you for the review & the fixes! Jari On Nov 5, 2013, at 9:09 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Hi, > > The revised version addresses all of my Gen-ART review comments. > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > On Nov 4, 2013, at 8:16 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: > >> Ben, >> >> A new draft version has be

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-housley-smime-oids-00.txt

Suresh: thank you for the review. Russ: I know you are on an airplane at the moment :-) but what Suresh points out below seems like an important edit. Could we place an RFC Editor's note and/or fix the document before final approval. Sean, do you know what to do? I'd rather not raise a Discuss o

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-labreqs-04

Roni: many thanks for the review. > > Minor issues: > > The document is not a requirement document. It is a use case, requirement and > solution document so the abstract and the title are confusing. > > I think it will be better to have the use case section before the > requirements in secti

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-ops-model-09

Ben: thank you for the review! AUthors - do you have a comment on the expired key suggestion? I think I agree with it… Jari On Nov 19, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wik

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-07

Thank you for the review & the edits! Jari On Oct 9, 2013, at 1:27 PM, "Black, David" wrote: > After discussion with the authors, the -07 version of this draft resolves > the two issues in the Gen-ART review of the -06 version. In summary: > > - Text has been added to explain the relationship

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-malformed-mail-10

On Nov 7, 2013, at 12:04 AM, "Black, David" wrote: > The -10 version of this draft responds to all of the nits/editorial comments > noted in the Gen-ART review of the -09 version. Thank you for the review & the fixes! Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Ge

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-soc-load-control-event-package-10.txt

Thank you Dan for the review and Charles for addressing the concerns. I have placed a no-obj position for this document on this week's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 25, 2013, at 11:39 AM, charles newyork wrote: > That's great, I will keep it as in the current 11 version then. Again thank > you s

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-forces-ceha-08.txt

Thank you Francis for your careful review (as always) and Evangelos for taking the comments into account in the new draft. I have placed a no-obj position for this document in this week's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 19, 2013, at 1:57 AM, Haleplidis Evangelos wrote: > Greetings Francis, > > Th

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ipfix-mediation-protocol-07

Thanks for the review, Meral, and for taking the issues into account, Benoit. I have placed a no-obj recommendation for this document in this week's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 26, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: > Hi Meral, > > Thanks for your feedback. > See > http://tools.ietf.or

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc6506bis-01.txt

Thank you Brian - another review that spotted important issues. Thanks all for taking care of this. I have placed a no-obj recommendation for the document in this week's telechat. Jari On Nov 13, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Thanks Acee. I will update the review when this com

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-bfd-on-lags-02

Thank you for your review, Joel! Jari On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments al

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-08

Thanks for your review, Peter! Btw, I am trying to understand what happened when this document went to PS from INF. Last calls were definitely on INF. Jari On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:23 PM, Peter Yee wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please se

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-leiba-smime-type-registry-02

Thanks for your review, Ben! Jari On Nov 25, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > >> Hi, Ben, and thanks for the review. >> >>> -- It might be helpful to include the URL of the parent registry. I assume >>> it's intended to be http://ww

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-requirements-13

Thank you Christer for your review, and for Kent for addressing the comments. I have placed a no-obj recommendation for this draft. Jari On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-05

Thanks for your review, Alexey! I have placed a no-obj recommendation for this draft on this week's IESG telechat. Jari On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:46 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04.txt

Thanks for your review, Suresh. Randy et al - any comments? Jari On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:52 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer > for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization

Thank you for your review, Scott! I have placed a no-obj position for this document in today's IESG telechat. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-03.txt

Brian: thank you very much for your review. And thanks for separating personal comments from gen-art comments (probably a good practice when we have personal opinions on a topic.) jari On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:27 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.

Re: [Gen-art] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-deployment-11.txt

Thanks for checking! Jari On Dec 16, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Jari, > > You already ballotted on this, but since there are quite large changes > I had a quick look, and they all seem to be improvements. > > Regards > Brian __

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11

Thanks for your review, Robert! I have balloted no-objection for this draft on the upcoming IESG telechat. #begin non-blocking-comment For what it is worth, I agree with Robert's comment that some highlighting of the interoperability challenges of vendor-specific options might have been useful

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-ug-05

Thanks for your review, Martin. I have balloted no-obj for this draft. Jari On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > .

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-rosen-rph-reg-policy-01.txt

Thanks for your review, Brian. I too would be interested in seeing a response to Brian's question. Brian R, Adam, Richard? Jari On Dec 13, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < htt

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-06

Thanks again for your review, Robert. I have balloted a no-obj position for this draft on the upcoming IESG telechat. Jari On Dec 13, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis-14

David, Thank you for your review and the re-review. And thank you authors (and David) for addressing the issues! I have balloted a no-obj position for this document on this week's IESG telechat agenda. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14

Thanks for your review, Vijay! jari On Nov 26, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments along

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-09

Thank you for your review, Kathleen I have balloted no-obj for this document. Jari On Nov 18, 2013, at 4:09 PM, "Moriarty, Kathleen" wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-howto-10.txt

Thank you Russ for this review and re-review :-) I have balloted no-obj. Jari On Dec 13, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-14

> You checked. All is well. +1 Thank you Kathleen for the review. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ecrit-country-emg-urn-01

On Dec 2, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > Thank You very much for the review, Scott! +1 I have balloted no-obj for this document. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-security-options-09.txt

Thanks for the review, Suresh! Magnus & Richard: the document is up for the IESG telechat on Thursday, and currently there are no Discusses. Make sure we're doing Approved::Revised ID Needed, in case there are no other reasons to revise the document (and you believe changes are needed). Jari O

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >