Thanks for the review! On Oct 1, 2013, at 1:09 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniele, > > Your suggested actions to address my issues look good. > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > Christer > > > From: Daniele Ceccarelli > Sent: Monday, 30 September 2013 5:01 PM > To: Christer Holmberg; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model....@tools.ietf.org > Subject: RE: Genart review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-11 > > Hi Christer, > > Thanks for the rewiew. v12 of the drafts should solve your comments. > > General: > ----------- > > Q_G_1: The document says “ITU-T recommendation G.XXX”, “ITU-T > G.XXX”, and “G.XXX”. Please use consistent terminology. > Authors> ITU-T recommendation G.XXX used on first use and > then just G.XXX > > Section 3: > ------------- > > Q_3_1: The text says “ITU-T recommendation defines”. I guess > that shall be G.709? > Authors> Right, substituted with: G.709-2012 > > BR > Daniele > > > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] > Sent: giovedì 26 settembre 2013 10:12 > To: gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model....@tools.ietf.org > Subject: Genart review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-11 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a > new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-11 > Reviewer: Christer Holmberg > Review Date: 26 September 2013 > IETF LC End Date: 19 September, 2013 > IESG Telechat date: N/A > > Summary: The document is well written, and ready for publication, > but contains some editorial issues that I suggest that the authors consider > addressing. > > Major issues: - > > Minor issues: - > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > General: > ----------- > > Q_G_1: The document says “ITU-T recommendation G.XXX”, “ITU-T > G.XXX”, and “G.XXX”. Please use consistent terminology. > > > Section 3: > ------------- > > Q_3_1: The text says “ITU-T recommendation defines”. I guess > that shall be G.709? > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
