Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Pete, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On Oct 28, 2022, at 01:13, Pete Resnick via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review
Thomas, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for
this document.
Lars
> On Jan 24, 2023, at 20:35, Thomas Fossati via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Thomas Fossati
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>
Meral, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On Jan 14, 2023, at 01:57, Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The
Hi Pete,
I like the suggestion below; anyone else have an issue with incorporating it?
Cheers,
>
>> On Oct 28, 2022, at 01:13, Pete Resnick via Datatracker
>> wrote:
>>
>> This paragraph in section 4 struck me oddly:
>>
>> An extension member (see Section 3.2) MAY occur in the Problem fiel
