Hi Pete, I like the suggestion below; anyone else have an issue with incorporating it?
Cheers, > >> On Oct 28, 2022, at 01:13, Pete Resnick via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> >> wrote: >> >> This paragraph in section 4 struck me oddly: >> >> An extension member (see Section 3.2) MAY occur in the Problem field >> if its name is compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see >> Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and if the defining problem type >> specifies a Structured Type to serialize the value into. >> >> That almost sounds like what you want to say is: >> >> If an extension member (see Section 3.2) occurs in the Problem field, >> its name MUST be compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see >> Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and the defining problem type >> MUST specify a Structured Type to serialize the value into. >> >> I'm curious if you are making a normative statement that would get lost in >> the >> current form. But I'm not sure what the high-order bit here is, so I leave it >> to you. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
