Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03

Hi Reese, Thanks for the review. However, I think the text is correct as is. The first part is saying the measures might not deter anyone, while the second part says they might be deterred (finding it not feasible). Nevertheless, this PR makes the sentence read a little better: https://github.co

Re: [Gen-art] [Emu] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-10

On Jan 24, 2023, at 1:35 PM, Thomas Fossati via Datatracker wrote: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > OLD > There remain some differences between EAP-TLS and other TLS-based EAP > methods which necessitates this document. > NEW > There remain some differences between EAP-TLS and other TLS-b

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-elegy-rfc8989bis-03

Hi Martin, I see, makes sense. Thanks for still tweaking the sentence! This resolves the issue. Best, Reese On 1/25/23 09:00, Martin Duke wrote: Hi Reese, Thanks for the review. However, I think the text is correct as is. The first part is saying the measures might not deter anyone, while