Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-raw-ldacs-10

2022-04-19 Thread Nils.Maeurer
Dear Dale Worley, Thank you for your comments. Inline you will find replies to the raised issues and we are planning to incorporate related updates in the next version. Best, Nils Mäurer -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dale Worley via Datatracker Gesendet: Freitag, 1. April 2022 04:51

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-bar-ipa-11

2022-04-19 Thread Lars Eggert
Meral, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-3-26, at 0:30, Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-04

2022-04-19 Thread Lars Eggert
Matt, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. I think the editorial suggestions below make sense and hope the authors will consider them. Lars > On 2022-3-17, at 2:38, Matt Joras via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Matt Joras > Review result: Read

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-11

2022-04-19 Thread Lars Eggert
Pete, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-4-16, at 0:49, Pete Resnick via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > R

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-04

2022-04-19 Thread Randy Bush
> I think the editorial suggestions below make sense and hope the > authors will consider them. they were, mostly in -06 and one still in an emacs buffer due to a mistake on my part. randy ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-09

2022-04-19 Thread Lars Eggert
Christer, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following discussion. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document based on the current revision that addressed the issue Christer identified. Lars > On 2022-4-11, at 23:35, Christer Holmberg via Datatracker > wrote: >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-applicability-14

2022-04-19 Thread Lars Eggert
Ines, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-2-8, at 2:03, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Revi

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-04

2022-04-19 Thread Salz, Rich
Yeah, the mistake is using emacs. Haha. Hope you and yours are all well and good. On 4/19/22, 12:31 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote: > I think the editorial suggestions below make sense and hope the > authors will consider them. they were, mostly in -06 and one still in an emacs buffer du

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-manageability-14

2022-04-19 Thread Lars Eggert
Elwyn, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2022-2-8, at 3:29, Elwyn Davies via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Rev