Matt, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.
I think the editorial suggestions below make sense and hope the authors will consider them. Lars > On 2022-3-17, at 2:38, Matt Joras via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > Reviewer: Matt Joras > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity-?? > Reviewer: Matt Joras > Review Date: 2022-03-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2022-03-18 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Nits/editorial comments: > 2. The Bottom Line > > This choice of idiom for a section title feels a bit weird. I understand > what's > trying to be conveyed but I have to imagine there's a way to do it without > relying on an idiom. > > That the RPKI does not authenticate real-world identity is a feature, > not a bug. If it tried to do so, aside from the liability, it would > end in a world of complexity with no proof of termination, as X.400 > learned. > > Again, "is a feature, not a bug" feels gratuitous, I would consider simply > stating a fact (e.g. "RPKI does not authenticate real-world identities. This > was a deliberate choice in its design") rather than relying on this > expression. > > If it tried to do so, aside from the liability, it would > end in a world of complexity with no proof of termination, as X.400 > learned. > What "liability" exactly is this referring to? Referencing X.400 in this way > without an actual reference feels wrong. Similar to above, "world of > complexity", is another expression that feels out of place in this document > when a more straightforward statement on complexity would do. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
