On December 21, 2021 at 8:01:21 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
Gyan:
Hi! Happy New Year!
Thank you for the review!
...
> Summary: ... The new BGP role capabilities mismatch code 2 subcode 8
> discussed on ML seems to have multiple implementations deployed and one
> confined by Cisco. I agree that the
Hi Alvaro
Happy New Year!
Welcome!
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 10:12 AM Alvaro Retana
wrote:
> On December 21, 2021 at 8:01:21 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> Gyan:
>
> Hi! Happy New Year!
>
> Thank you for the review!
>
>
> ...
> > Summary: ... The new BGP role capabilities mismatch code 2 subcode 8
>
On January 4, 2022 at 10:44:35 AM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
Gyan:
...
> > All capabilities are signaled in the OPEN, so there's no possibility
> > for receiving a Role Capability afterwards.
>
> Gyan> Agreed. The multiple capabilities received is mentioned in the text,
> Gyan> however as it’s signaled
Hi Russ,
And thanks for your review. Please see below.
On 13.12.21 23:02, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your review. Please see below.
On 14.12.21 11:15, tom petch wrote:
From: OPSAWG on behalf of Russ Housley via Datatracker
Sent: 13 December 2021 22:02
Subject: [OPSAWG] Genart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-03
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Almost R
Hi Gyan,
[I am following up on the messages exchanged between Alvaro and you this
morning. Thanks to both of you for that.]
Sorry for the delay in replying (considering your original review date). Thank
you for your careful review and comments/nits. Please see responses marked with
[KS/AA] be
Also, regarding:
> This specification does not allow for vulnerability information to be
> retrieved directly from the endpoint. That's because vulnerability
> information changes occur at different rates to software updates.
In practice today, consumers are indeed retrieving vulnerab
From: Eliot Lear
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2022 16:28
To: tom petch; gen-art@ietf.org; Russ Housley
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] some YANG thoughts on draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-03
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your review. Please see below.
On 04.01.22 18:02, tom petch wrote:
*From:* Eliot Lear
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 04, 2022 16:28
*To:* tom petch; gen-art@ietf.org; Russ Housley
*Cc:* draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access@ietf.org; ops...@ietf.org
*Subject:* Re: [OPSAWG] some YANG thoughts on
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-03
Hi T
Hi Sriram & Alexander
Responses in-line
Kind Regards
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:35 AM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <
kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov> wrote:
> Hi Gyan,
>
> [I am following up on the messages exchanged between Alvaro and you this
> morning. Thanks to both of you for that.]
>
> Sorry fo
Thanks Alvaro !
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:02 AM Alvaro Retana
wrote:
> On January 4, 2022 at 10:44:35 AM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> Gyan:
>
>
> ...
> > > All capabilities are signaled in the OPEN, so there's no possibility
> > > for receiving a Role Capability afterwards.
> >
> > Gyan> Agreed. The
11 matches
Mail list logo
