Gyan, thank you for your review. I have not seen a response from the editors to
your review yet, and so I'm holding off for the moment on entering a ballot for
this document.
Authors, would you please respond to Gyan's review?
Thanks,
Lars
> On 2021-4-29, at 8:46, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
Hi Lars
I met with the authors on Friday 5/14 and we went over my questions and
review of the draft in detail.
I will respond today with a detailed update on the status of my review
based on feedback from the authors from Friday meeting that the draft is in
a “Ready” state with minor updates & re
Stewart, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for
this document.
Lars
> On 2021-5-4, at 20:39, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this
document based on my own review.
Lars
> On 2021-4-27, at 1:48, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General A
Hi Joel,
thanks for the review, please see my responses below.
Joel Halpern via Datatracker writes:
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being proces
Thank you Lada.
I had missed the union, reading the introductory material with more
attention.
Glad to hear IANA did an early review.
Yours,
Joel
On 5/17/2021 8:25 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Hi Joel,
thanks for the review, please see my responses below.
Joel Halpern via Datatracker writes:
