Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04

2020-04-15 Thread Balázs Varga A
Hi Christer, Thanks for your review. Replies/comments inline marked with . We are working on an updated version of the draft to incorporate your comments as well. Thanks Bala'zs -Original Message- From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2020 11:29 AM To: gen-art@

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-data-plane-framework-04

2020-04-15 Thread Christer Holmberg
Hi Bala'zs, Thank you for the reply and clarifications. I still have a question on Q2. ... Q2: >> The first line of the 2nd paragraph of the Introduction says: >> >> “This document describes the concepts needed by any DetNet data plane specification…” >> >> What

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Dale R. Worley
Todd Herr writes: > Having reviewed the comments, I'm wondering if perhaps the following draft > rewrite of the Abstract section might be a first step to address many of > the points raised? I heartily endorse the sentiment behind this. I think there are some minor improvements that could be mad

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 10:32:32 PM EDT Dale R. Worley wrote: > Todd Herr writes: > > Having reviewed the comments, I'm wondering if perhaps the following draft > > rewrite of the Abstract section might be a first step to address many of > > the points raised? > > I heartily endorse the sent

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Seth Blank
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:45 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I think you are very close to an Abstract/Introduction that is clearly > > comprehensible to people who are not familiar with DMARC. > > Considering this is an extension to DMARC, I don't think that's the target > audience. > As an indiv

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:31 PM Seth Blank wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:45 PM Scott Kitterman > wrote: > >> > I think you are very close to an Abstract/Introduction that is clearly >> > comprehensible to people who are not familiar with DMARC. >> >> Considering this is an extension to DMAR

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Apologies: On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > +1. If even a small number of people (and the GenART review itself might > be enough) thinks it's in need of this kind of improvement, I would be > surprised if the IESG sends it back to the working group for revision. If

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 16, 2020 3:30:59 AM UTC, Seth Blank wrote: >On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:45 PM Scott Kitterman >wrote: > >> > I think you are very close to an Abstract/Introduction that is >clearly >> > comprehensible to people who are not familiar with DMARC. >> >> Considering this is an extension to D