Apologies: On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1. If even a small number of people (and the GenART review itself might > be enough) thinks it's in need of this kind of improvement, I would be > surprised if the IESG sends it back to the working group for revision. If > the goal is to get this thing published so people can start conducting the > experiment, putting the work in now can only help you. > *wouldn't -MSK
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
