Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-30 Thread thomas.morin
Hi Brian, 2015-09-30, Brian E Carpenter: "Good consensus among a solid although small set of contributors (two vendors on the draft and a third vendor supporting the proposal)." I wonder if that really means "Nobody else cares." Going back in the bess and l3vpn mail archives, I only found one si

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-30 Thread Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
I am the one to blame. Alvaro had all the reasons to believe I'd addressed his comments (I shared a diff), but then I had a second thought one issue and did not continue with the submission. I have now submitted a new revision: URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-be

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-02

2015-09-30 Thread Brian E Carpenter
OK, thanks. I think that those updates take care of most things for me. I still think that this is not really an *update* to RFC 6514; it's an alternative solution. But that's a minor issue, so when I am asked to re-review this for the telechat I will rate it "Ready". BTW I got a horrible bounce

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp-stp-04

2015-09-30 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Andy, I think most people think of a spanning tree as being constructed over a set of bridges, so I guess that in addition to the sentences you quote, I would be happy to see a more conceptual description in the Introduction. "The spanning tree will be formed over [some set of nodes] without the