I am the one to blame. Alvaro had all the reasons to believe I'd addressed his comments (I shared a diff), but then I had a second thought one issue and did not continue with the submission.
I have now submitted a new revision: URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-03 Thanks! Jeffrey > -----Original Message----- > From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aret...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:10 AM > To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; draft-ietf-bess-mvpn- > bidir-ingress-replication....@ietf.org; General Area Review Team <gen- > a...@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-bidir- > ingress-replication-02 > > On 9/29/15, 9:50 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Brian: > > >The AD Review asks for a number of changes. To be frank, it's a bit > >annoying > >to be asked to do a review of a draft that will change during the Last > >Call. > > Yes, I apologize. The authors had the revision ready on Sep/25, but it > wasn¹t submitted. :-( > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
