Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Apologies: On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:39 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > +1. If even a small number of people (and the GenART review itself might > be enough) thinks it's in need of this kind of improvement, I would be > surprised if the IESG sends it back to the working group for revision. If

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 8:31 PM Seth Blank wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:45 PM Scott Kitterman > wrote: > >> > I think you are very close to an Abstract/Introduction that is clearly >> > comprehensible to people who are not familiar with DMARC. >> >> Considering this is an extension to DMAR

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Seth Blank
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:45 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I think you are very close to an Abstract/Introduction that is clearly > > comprehensible to people who are not familiar with DMARC. > > Considering this is an extension to DMARC, I don't think that's the target > audience. > As an indiv

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 10:32:32 PM EDT Dale R. Worley wrote: > Todd Herr writes: > > Having reviewed the comments, I'm wondering if perhaps the following draft > > rewrite of the Abstract section might be a first step to address many of > > the points raised? > > I heartily endorse the sent

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-15 Thread Dale R. Worley
Todd Herr writes: > Having reviewed the comments, I'm wondering if perhaps the following draft > rewrite of the Abstract section might be a first step to address many of > the points raised? I heartily endorse the sentiment behind this. I think there are some minor improvements that could be mad

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-09 Thread Kurt Andersen (b)
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:36 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > That seems like it paints a much clearer picture, which is what Dale was > after. A great start! > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:54 PM Todd Herr wrote: > >> Having reviewed the comments, I'm wondering if perhaps the following >> draft

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-09 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
(Reducing Ccs) That seems like it paints a much clearer picture, which is what Dale was after. A great start! On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:54 PM Todd Herr wrote: > Having reviewed the comments, I'm wondering if perhaps the following draft > rewrite of the Abstract section might be a first step to

Re: [Gen-art] [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-09 Thread Todd Herr
Having reviewed the comments, I'm wondering if perhaps the following draft rewrite of the Abstract section might be a first step to address many of the points raised? *AbstractDMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originatin