Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

Hi Paul, Please see inline > -Original Message- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:49 AM > To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy); draft-ietf-pcp- > authentication@tools.ietf.org > Cc: General Area Review Team > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telec

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review for draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parameter-configuration-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-roll-mpl-parame

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

On 7/7/15 9:04 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: Yes. At this point I think you and I understand what we're talking about. I haven't been involved in this doc in a while. I think we need to let Tirumaleswar comment as well as get feedback from the rest of the group. The main think I have been bringing to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

Yes. At this point I think you and I understand what we're talking about. I haven't been involved in this doc in a while. I think we need to let Tirumaleswar comment as well as get feedback from the rest of the group. Some of this may have been discussed in the WG while I was not watching, and you

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-10 Reviewer:

Re: [Gen-art] [homenet] Objection to late change in draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment

Hi, Thanks for including me. Adding back gen-art list to this thread. I am ok with Brian's suggested text. Best, Meral -Original Message- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 2:25 PM To: Pierre Pfister Cc: IESG; home...@ietf.org; M

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-homenet-pr

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

On 7/7/15 2:29 PM, Sam Hartman wrote: >> You seem to be thinking of authentication as something that tends >> to benefit the server. In some deployments that's certainly >> true. However, the client may gain significant benefit from: >> >> * Gaining integrity protectio

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

Hi Tiru, While the discussion with you and Sam continues on the major points, I'll comment here on the others. I'm trimming to just the points I'm replying to. On 7/6/15 10:20 AM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) wrote: [EDITORIAL] Also, I'm still troubled by: From now on, every PCP messa

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

> "Paul" == Paul Kyzivat writes: Paul> Hi Sam, Paul> On 7/7/15 11:24 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: >>> "Paul" == Paul Kyzivat writes: >> Paul> Do you agree with this conclusion? If not, please explain why Paul> you think my logic is wrong. >> >> I partially agr

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

Hi Sam, On 7/7/15 11:24 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: "Paul" == Paul Kyzivat writes: Paul> Do you agree with this conclusion? If not, please explain why Paul> you think my logic is wrong. I partially agree with your conclusion. I agree that we need a mechanism to resynchronize state, and

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

> "Paul" == Paul Kyzivat writes: Paul> Do you agree with this conclusion? If not, please explain why Paul> you think my logic is wrong. I partially agree with your conclusion. I agree that we need a mechanism to resynchronize state, and I agree that unsolicited announces aren't reall

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-13.txt

Hi Tiru, Before responding to you in detail about the draft text, I think we need to resolve some general mechanism issues. You responded to my questions about multiple PA sessions by saying that a host can have several independent PCP clients, and described in RFC6887. But that misses my po

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-btle-14

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-6lo-btle-14.